Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S734–S760. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.08.20

Table 2. Summary of intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory correlation coefficients (r), coefficient of variation (CV), and intra- and inter-observer variation (%) for SDF assays.

Method Intra-lab (r) Intra-lab (CV) Inter-lab (r) Inter-lab (CV) Intra-observer variation (%) Inter-observer variation (%) Study
TUNEL; benchtop flow cytometer 0.75–0.956 0.1–5.7% 0.83–0.937 0.2–5.2% NR NR Ribeiro et al., 2017
TUNEL; benchtop flow cytometer NR NR NA NA ≤3%4 ≤1.7%5 Sharma et al., 2016
TUNEL; standard flow cytometry NR NR NA NA 3.2%2 4%3 Sharma et al., 2010
SCD* 0.91 NR NA NA 1%9 0.21%10 McEvoy et al., 2014
SCD NR NR NA NA 6–12%8 6–12%8 Fernandez et al., 2005
SCSA NA NA 0.90 ≤1% NA NA Giwercman et al., 2003
NR 1.0–9.1%1 NA NA NA NA Giwercman et al., 1999

*, Halosperm G2 test kit; 1, intra-assay CV varied between 1.0% and 9.1%, and the corresponding values for the inter-assay CV was 5.2% and 8.6%; 2, when absolute values were calculated, 80.0% of individual TUNEL measurement differed from the final designated values by no more than 3.2% (absolute difference); 57.1% of individual measurements in these data had a percentage difference less than 10% of the assigned value; 3, the absolute difference between an observer’s designated value and the mean among 2 observers was within 4.0% in 83.3% of specimens; in 83.3% of the specimens, the percentage difference between an individual observer’s designated TUNEL value and the 2 observers’ average value was within 15%; 4, a single TUNEL measurement from a given observer was within that observer’s average measurement by an absolute difference of 3% or less in 90% of cases; 5, the average TUNEL measurement from a given observer was within the two observers’ average measurements with an absolute difference of 1.73% or less in 80% of cases; 6, correlation between duplicate readings obtained in each laboratory (results from two participating laboratories); 7, correlation coefficient between two participating laboratories reading the same set of specimens; 8, coefficient of variation for the estimated percentage of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA; 9, the average difference in the values of SDF between the two replicates was 1.02%±0.55% (absolute variation); the average percentage difference between the two replicates for each sample was 4.16%; 10, the average difference in the values of SDF between two technicians for each sample was 0.21%±0.57% (absolute difference); the average percentage difference between the two technicians for each sample was 9.56%. SDF, sperm DNA fragmentation; TUNEL, terminal deoxyribonucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay; SCD, sperm chromatin dispersion test; SCSA, sperm chromatin structure assay; NR, not reported; NA, not applicable; CV, coefficient of variation.