Table 2.
Natural populations | Year (number of accessions) |
TaFlo2-A1a
Mean ± SEa (number of accessions) |
TaFlo2-A1b
Mean ± SE (number of accessions) |
Mean difference ± SE | PVE (%)b TGW | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGW | GpS | TGW | GpS | TGW | GpS | |||
Chinese Micro Core Collection | 2002 (137) | 33.6 ± 0.54(98) | 50.8 ± 1.2(98) | 40.6 ± 1.2(39) | 49.7 ± 1.5(39) | 7.0 ± 1.1** | 1.06 ± 2.1ns | 6.19 |
2005 (169) | 30.7 ± 0.52(128) | 43.1 ± 0.8(128) | 38.5 ± 1.1(41) | 40.5 ± 1.1(41) | 7.8 ± 1.1** | 2.6 ± 1.5 ns | 7.76 | |
2006 (185) | 32.8 ± 0.43(141) | 51.4 ± 0.7(141) | 41.2 ± 0.9(44) | 48.6 ± 1.2(43) | 8.4 ± 0.9** | 2.7 ± 1.5 ns | 8.37 | |
Pakistani collection | 2009 (130) | 40.6 ± 0.43(85) | 46.6 ± 1.1(85) | 45.1 ± 0.55(45) | 44.4–1.8(45) | 4.5 + 0.71** | 2.2 ± 1.9 ns | 4.42 |
2010 (130) | 40.5 ± 0.47(85) | 47.8 ± 1.2(85) | 45.7 ± 0.46(45) | 44.9 + 1.6(45) | 5.2 ± 0.72** | 2.9 ± 2.0 ns | 5.11 |
**indicates significant differences, and ns indicates non-significant differences (P < 0.01; Student’s t-test) among groups carrying different haplotypes
aStandard error
bPercentage of phenotypic variance explained by association analysis