Table 2.
Segment | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | – | 10,378 | 17,700 | 26,494 | 11,041 | 12,955 | 15,541 | 8745 | 12,441 |
2 | 7100 | – | 1908 | 11,511 | 4635 | 4823 | 5961 | 5295 | 8089 |
3 | 13,765 | 5472 | – | 13,087 | 10,540 | 15,234 | 10,690 | 10,714 | 10,508 |
4 | 14,493 | 11,159 | 7432 | – | 6411 | 9415 | 8898 | 12,331 | 13,047 |
5 | 13,057 | 8894 | 12,004 | 16,317 | – | 14,431 | 10,825 | 12,648 | 11,782 |
6 | 8979 | 7055 | 8418 | 5340 | 8223 | – | 2023 | 9517 | 8523 |
7 | 15,661 | 10,081 | 10,433 | 6309 | 11,983 | 4014 | – | 13,848 | 15,287 |
8 | 3819 | 3428 | 4378 | 8328 | 5980 | 3416 | 3095 | – | 3069 |
9 | 6474 | 4660 | 6312 | 9181 | 3951 | 4865 | 4985 | 2889 | – |
For the sequence data of each segment (rows), the differences in log-likelihood scores between the original tree topology and each other tree topology (columns) are given.
P-values for the differences are all lower than 0.001