Table 3.
The changes in outcome, when comparing postoperative with FU2 outcome, per domain per group (HRG, LRG, Redo)
| Changes postoperative versus FU2 | Neurological | Urological | Orthopedic | Pain | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRG (n = 26) | LRG (n = 24) | Redo (n = 10) | HRG (n = 26) | LRG (n = 24) | Redo (n = 10) | HRG (n = 25)a | LRG (n = 24) | Redo (n = 10) | HRG (n = 26) | LRG (n = 24) | Redo (n = 10) | ||||||||||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | ||
| Improved | 1 step | 1 | 3.8 | 2 | 8.3 | – | – | 2 | 7.7 | 1 | 4.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | 7.7 | 2 | 8.3 | 3 | 30.0 |
| 2 steps | 2 | 7.7 | 1 | 4.2 | – | – | 2 | 7.7 | 1 | 4.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 3 steps | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 3.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 10.0 | |
| Subtotal | 3 | 11.5 | 3 | 12.5 | – | – | 5 | 19.2 | 2 | 8.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | 7.7 | 2 | 8.3 | 4 | 40.0 | |
| Stable | 20 | 76.9 | 19 | 79.2 | 8 | 80.0 | 20 | 76.9 | 20 | 83.3 | 9 | 90.0 | 18 | 72.0 | 21 | 87.5 | 8 | 80.0 | 22 | 84.6 | 20 | 83.3 | 6 | 60.0 | |
| Deteriorated | 1 step | 2 | 7.7 | 2 | 8.3 | 2 | 20.0 | – | – | 1 | 4.2 | – | – | 4 | 16.0 | 1 | 4.2 | 1 | 10.0 | – | – | 2 | 8.3 | – | – |
| 2 steps | 1 | 3.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 12.0 | 2 | 8.3 | – | – | 2 | 7.7 | – | – | – | – | |
| 3 steps | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 3.8 | 1 | 4.2 | 1 | 10.0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Subtotal | 3 | 11.5 | 2 | 8.3 | 2 | 20.0 | 1 | 3.8 | 2 | 8.3 | 1 | 10.0 | 7 | 28.0 | 3 | 12.5 | 1 | 10.0 | 2 | 7.7 | 2 | 8.3 | – | – | |
aOne missing data
The difference between subtotal improvement and the subtotal deteriorations is partly visualized in Fig. 2.
N number, HRG high-risk group, LRG low-risk group, Redo redetethering