Skip to main content
. 2013 May 22;6(3):217–227. doi: 10.1159/000351726

Table 3.

Beta for the effect of dietary intake on change in body size or metabolic factor (n = 585) a

Change c in variable EI decrease b , per 100 kcal/day
High-fat versus low-fat diet
Change b in fat%, per 5 units
Change b in prot%, per 5 units
Basic model d Basic model d + adj for EI change e Basic model d + adj for EI change e Basic model d + adj for EI change e
Weight, −0.08 0.44 0.36 0.08 0.04 −0.36 −0.13
 kg p < 0.001 f p = 0.1 p = 0.2 p = 0.2 p = 0.5 p = 0.07 p = 0.5
Fat mass, −0.06 0.34 0.29 0.07 0.05 −0.23 −0.05
 kg p = 0.005 p = 0.2 p = 0.2 p = 0.2 p = 0.4 p = 0.2 p = 0.8
Fat-free mass, −0.03 0.11 0.08 0.00 −0.01 −0.06 0.04
 kg p = 0.04 g p = 0.5 p = 0.6 p = 0.9 p = 0.7 p = 0.6 p = 0.8
Waist circumference, −0.07 0.48 0.41 0.00 −0.03 −0.30 −0.09
 cm p = 0.02 p = 0.2 p = 0.3 p = 1.0 p = 0.7 p = 0.3 p = 0.8
Plasma glucose, 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 −0.01 −0.01
 mmol/l p = 1.0 p = 0.8 p = 0.8 p = 0.5 p = 0.5 p = 0.8 p = 0.7
Serum insulin, 0.05 2.58 2.59 −0.16 −0.14 1.95 2.04
 pmol/l p = 0.8 p = 0.3 p = 0.3 p = 0.8 p = 0.8 p = 0.3 p = 0.3
HOMA-IR 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04
p = 0.8 p = 0.3 p = 0.3 p = 0.7 p = 0.7 p = 0.2 p = 0.3
Free fatty acids, 0.72 −8.75 −7.73 −0.05 0.25 −6.68 −10.0
 µmol/l p = 0.5 p = 0.4 p = 0.5 p = 1.0 p = 0.9 p = 0.4 p = 0.3
Triglycerides, −7.30 −79.3 −86.9 −21.1 −24.8 −36.7 −17.0
 µmol/l p = 0.006 p = 0.009 p = 0.004 p = 0.002 p < 0.001 p = 0.1 h p = 0.5 h
Total cholesterol, −0.01 0.14 0.13 0.03 0.03 −0.08 −0.06
 mmol/l p = 0.009 p = 0.002 p = 0.003 p < 0.001 p = 0.001 p = 0.01 p = 0.1
LDL/HDL ratio 0.00 −0.01 −0.02 0.00 0.00 −0.03 −0.02
p = 0.3 p = 0.8 p = 0.7 p = 0.8 p = 0.9 p = 0.4 p = 0.6

EI = Energy intake; adj = adjusted; fat% = percent energy intake from fat; prot% = percent energy intake from protein.

a

Data were missing or extreme values were excluded for: fat mass, 20 participants; fat-free mass, 23; waist circumference, 4; glucose, 4; insulin, 11; HOMA-IR, 11; free fatty acids, 1; triglycerides, 6; cholesterol, 2; LDL/HDL ratio, 10.

b

Difference between reported intake at baseline (day 1 + day 2 + day 3) / 3 and at week 2 and/or 5, and week 10 ((week 2 + week 5) / 2) + ((week 10, day 1 + day 2 + day 3) / 3) / 2.

c

Difference between baseline and after the intervention.

d

Adjusted for the baseline body size or metabolic factor of interest, sex, baseline body size/metabolic factor × sex, age, and centre. High-fat versus low-fat diet was additionally adjusted for baseline fat%.

e

Basic model with additional adjustment for change in energy intake.

f

Non-linear association, p = 0.02. Beta in categories: increased energy intake, 0.34 p = 0.5; 0−500 kcal/day decrease, 0 (reference); 500−1 000 kcal/day decrease, −0.97, p = 0.003; >1,000 kcal/day decrease, −0.90, p = 0.5.

g

Non-linear association, p = 0.02. Beta in categories: increased energy intake, 0.40 p = 0.2; 0−500 kcal/day decrease, 0 (reference); 500−1,000 kcal/day decrease, −0.12, p = 0.6; >1,000 kcal/day decrease, −0.28, p = 0.2.

h

Non-linear association, p = 0.02. Beta in categories: >5 prot% decrease, 190, p = 0.01 (EI adj, 158, p = 0.03); 0−5 prot% decrease, 44.3 p = 0.2 (EI adj, 24.9, p = 0.5); 0−5 prot% increase, 0 (reference); >5 prot% increase, 61.4, p = 0.2 (EI adj, 83.0, p = 0.08).