Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 2;6(1):70–85. doi: 10.1159/000348878

Table 3.

Assessment of study quality

[5] [19] [20] [13] [16] [9] [17] [18] [21] [24] [22] [23] [15] [14]
Power calculations performed n P n n n n n y y y n n n n
Was study adequately powered y n y y y y y y u y y y y y
Baseline characteristics of subjects reported P n P y P y P n P y n y y n
Subjects inclusion and exclusion criteria
specified (or in original survey)
y P y y y y y y y y y y y y
Exposure ascertained with reliable method y y y y y y y y y n/a y y y y
Information on the distribution of
exposure(s)
y y P y y y y y y n/a P y n y
Definition of outcome explicit y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Outcome reliably assessed and validated y y y n y y y y y y y y y y
Information on background dietary habits
provided
y y y y y P y n n n y y y y
Information on physical activity provided n n y n n y n y y y n y y n
Information on smoking/alcohol drinking
provided
n n n n n n n n n n n n n n
Dose-response assessed y y n y y y y y n y n y n n
Adequate adjustment for the effects of
confounding variables
n n P n n P P P P P n y y y
Statistical methods adequately described y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
Outcome assessors blinded to exposure
status
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a y n/a n/a n/a P n/a y n/a n/a
Appropriate duration of follow-up for
outcome to occur
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a y n/a n/a n/a P n/a y n/a n/a
Information on loss to follow-up provided n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a P n/a n/a n/a P n/a P n/a n/a
Design includes control group n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a y n/a n/a n/a n/a
Control and intervention group(s)
comparable at baseline for relevant risk
factors/outcome variables
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a y n/a n/a n/a n/a
Blinding of subjects n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n n/a n/a n/a n/a
Compliance of subjects with the
intervention reported
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a P n/a n/a n/a n/a
Analyses include an intention to treat
analysis
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n n/a n/a n/a n/a
Maximum score cross-sectional study = 14 9.5 8 9.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 9 7.5 10 9
Maximum score prospective study = 17 13.5 14.5
Maximum score intervention study = 20 13.5