Table 6.
Total (95% CI) | Boys (95% CI) | Girls (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
Club sportmother | 1.88 (1.08; 3.28) | 2.05 (0.92; 4.56) | 1.76 (0.78; 3.97) |
Club sportfather | 1.73 (1.04;2.88) | 1.66 (0.82; 3.34) | 1.73 (0.80; 3.75) |
High educationmother | 1.39 (0.87; 2.20) | 1.31 (0.68; 2.52) | 1.40 (0.71; 2.75) |
High educationfather | 0.83 (0.53; 1.29) | 0.71 (0.37; 1.37) | 0.95 (0.50; 1.83) |
Migration background | 0.25 (0.16; 0.38) | 0.35 (0.19; 0.62) | 0.17 (0.09; 0.31) |
Regular breakfastchild | 1.84 (1.03; 3.27) | 1.08 (0.45; 2.63) | 2.92 (1.27; 6.72) |
Regular soft drinkchild | 0.57 (0.38; 0.86) | 0.42 (0.23; 0.76) | 0.80 (0.43; 1.49) |
High sported | 1.37 (0.90; 2.09) | 1.31 (0.72; 2.37) | 1.38 (0.74; 2.57) |
High TV timechild | 0.56 (0.37; 0.85) | 0.46 (0.26; 0.82) | 0.66 (0.36; 1.23) |
Overweighted | 0.43 (0.24; 0.77) | 0.38 (0.18; 0.82) | 0.44 (0.17; 1.11) |
| |||
Correctly classified, % | 72.2 | 78.2 | 69.6 |
Cox & Snell R2 – Nagelkerke R2, % | 21.7–31.3 | 18.3–26.9 | 27.1–38.3 |
All variables were entered simultaneously in the model (N = 827). Significant results in italics.