Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 29;8(1):43–53. doi: 10.1159/000373900

Table 5.

Analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons of P-Weight scores

PC (n = 127)
mean (SD)
C (n = 110)
mean (SD)
Prep (n = 59)
mean (SD)
A (n = 416)
mean (SD)
M (n = 375)
mean (SD)
F (4, 1087) f Tukey comparisons
1. EmR 27.99
(18.03)
60.54
(20.67)
65.99
(18.30)
69.31
(17.74)
59.97
(21.67)
110.71** 0.76 PC < C**, Prep**, A**, M**;
C < A**;
M < A**.
2. WCE 13.55
(12.84)
32.50
(26.88)
38.21
(28.55)
39.78
(24.91)
32.70
(24.29)
30.31** 0.39 PC < C**, Prep**, A**, M**;
C < A*;
M < A**.
3. SR 18.46
(19.48)
34.64
(21.36)
47.88
(21.84)
51.95
(23.73)
42.95
(23.97)
56.72** 0.51 PC < C**, Prep**, A**, M**;
C < A**, M*;
M < A**.
4. WMA 24.53
(16.63)
37.00
(16.14)
42.54
(14.37)
51.08
(17.79)
48.72
(18.56)
65.41** 0.54 PC < C**, Prep**, A**, M**;
C < A**, M**;
Prep < A*.

EmR = Emotional re-evaluation; WCE = weight consequences evaluation; SR = supporting relationships; dWMA = weight management actions; e f = Cohen's f effect size

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.0001.