Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410

Table 8. Observed outcomes by treatment arm and by benefit/harm subgroup for the SPRINT trial (derivation cohort) and ACCORD-BP trial (validation cohort) when applying models fit by traditional backwards selection.

Cohort Benefit/harm subgroup Number of patients Number of events (%) Expected absolute risk difference (95% CI) Observed absolute risk difference, (95% CI) P value
Intensive treatment Standard treatment All patients Intensive treatment Standard treatment
SPRINT CVD events/deaths
1 (lowest predicted benefit) 990 982 76 (3.9) 38 (3.8) 38 (3.9) 0.000 (−0.010, 0.009) 0.000 (−0.017, 0.017), P = 0.971
2 (middle predicted benefit) 2,188 2,184 193 (4.4) 76 (3.5) 117 (5.4) −0.019 (−0.029, −0.010) −0.019 (−0.031, −0.007), P = 0.002
3 (highest predicted benefit) 1,181 1,139 211 (9.1) 86 (7.3) 125 (11.0) −0.051 (−0.112, −0.030) −0.037 (−0.060, −0.013), P = 0.002
Serious adverse events
1 (lowest predicted harm) 23 14 4 (10.8) 3 (13.0) 1 (7.1) 0.000 (−0.009, 0.005) 0.059 (−0.134, 0.252), P = 0.575
2 (middle predicted harm) 3,512 3,485 576 (8.2) 329 (9.4) 247 (7.1) 0.022 (0.009, 0.038) 0.023 (0.010, 0.036), P = 0.001
3 (highest predicted harm) 824 806 298 (18.3) 164 (19.9) 134 (16.6) 0.053 (0.040, 0.088) 0.033 (−0.005, 0.070), P = 0.087
ACCORD-BP CVD events/deaths
1 (lowest predicted benefit) 986 986 240 (12.2) 121 (12.3) 119 (12.1) 0.001 (−0.010, 0.027) 0.002 (−0.027, 0.031), P = 0.890
2 (middle predicted benefit) 748 765 208 (13.7) 95 (12.7) 113 (14.8) −0.018 (−0.010, 0.029) −0.021 (−0.055, 0.014), P = 0.242
3 (highest predicted benefit) 421 415 196 (23.4) 85 (20.2) 111 (26.7) −0.052 (−0.030, −0.115) −0.066 (−0.123, −0.008), P = 0.025
Serious adverse events
1 (lowest predicted harm) 17 13 9 (30.0) 8 (47.1) 1 (7.7) −0.003 (−0.019, 0.005) 0.394 (0.116, 0.672), P = 0.020
2 (middle predicted harm) 1,699 1,712 346 (10.1) 216 (12.7) 130 (7.6) 0.025 (0.011, 0.039) 0.051 (0.031, 0.071), P < 0.001
3 (highest predicted harm) 439 441 115 (13.1) 88 (20.0) 27 (6.1) 0.053 (0.040, 0.087) 0.139 (0.096, 0.183), P < 0.001

SPRINT cohort: N = 9,664 (intensive treatment, N = 4,359; standard treatment, N = 4,305). ACCORD-BP cohort: N = 4,321 (intensive treatment, N = 2,155; standard treatment, N = 2,166). The lowest predicted benefit subgroup had a <1-percentage-point predicted absolute risk reduction in CVD events/deaths, while the highest predicted benefit subgroup had a >3-percentage-point predicted absolute risk reduction. The lowest predicted harm subgroup had a <0.5-percentage-point predicted absolute risk increase in serious adverse events, while the highest predicted harm subgroup had a >4-percentage-point predicted absolute risk increase. Cut points were chosen to correspond to the tertiles of the distribution of predicted benefit and harm for the combined data from SPRINT and ACCORD-BP.

CVD, cardiovascular disease.