Table 3.
Challenges of mapping training needs to programs | Recommendations |
---|---|
Balancing between core components and specialization | 1. Tracks within programs could allow for specialization for health topic, context 2. Specialists could adapt core materials for given audience |
Rapid pace of field development | 1. Clearinghouse could host new materials as created. 2. Online virtual community could permit wiki-like updating of course materials |
Follow-up/Sustainability of training outcomes | 1. Linkage of course to ongoing activities (e.g. NCI Advanced Webinars; CIPRS/VA webinars) 2. Training “Graduate” Forums at large D&I conferences 3. Online networking via linkedin/facebook/researchgate |
Increasing supply to meet demand | 1. Train the trainer model could foster satellite trainings at “graduate” institutions 2. MOOCs/Online courses could expand reach, increase efficiency of training |
Sequencing of training vs. complementarity | 1. Training programs should specify inclusion/exclusion criteria in relation to one another 2. A field-wide strategy should articulate the complementarity of different training programs (see Proctor et al. paper, in preparation) |