Skip to main content
Translational Behavioral Medicine logoLink to Translational Behavioral Medicine
. 2017 May 25;7(3):444–466. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0506-0

Implementing health promotion activities using community-engaged approaches in Asian American faith-based organizations in New York City and New Jersey

SC Kwon 1, S Patel 1,, C Choy 1, J Zanowiak 1, C Rideout 1, S Yi 1, L Wyatt 1, MD Taher 1, MJ Garcia-Dia 2, SS Kim 3, TK Denholm 3, R Kavathe 4, NS Islam 1
PMCID: PMC5645289  PMID: 28547738

Abstract

Faith-based organizations (FBOs) (e.g., churches, mosques, and gurdwaras) can play a vital role in health promotion. The Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health for Asian Americans (REACH FAR) Project is implementing a multi-level and evidence-based health promotion and hypertension (HTN) control program in faith-based organizations serving Asian American (AA) communities (Bangladeshi, Filipino, Korean, Asian Indian) across multiple denominations (Christian, Muslim, and Sikh) in New York/New Jersey (NY/NJ). This paper presents baseline results and describes the cultural adaptation and implementation process of the REACH FAR program across diverse FBOs and religious denominations serving AA subgroups. Working with 12 FBOs, informed by implementation research and guided by a cultural adaptation framework and community-engaged approaches, REACH FAR strategies included (1) implementing healthy food policies for communal meals and (2) delivering a culturally-linguistically adapted HTN management coaching program. Using the Ecological Validity Model (EVM), the program was culturally adapted across congregation and faith settings. Baseline measures include (i) Congregant surveys assessing social norms and diet (n = 946), (ii) HTN participant program surveys (n = 725), (iii) FBO environmental strategy checklists (n = 13), and (iv) community partner in-depth interviews assessing project feasibility (n = 5). We describe the adaptation process and baseline assessments of FBOs. In year 1, we reached 3790 (nutritional strategies) and 725 (HTN program) via AA FBO sites. Most AA FBOs lack nutrition policies and present prime opportunities for evidence-based multi-level interventions. REACH FAR presents a promising health promotion implementation program that may result in significant community reach.

Keywords: Asian American, Implementation, Faith-based, Health promotion, Cultural adaptation

BACKGROUND

In the United States (US), nearly one-third of adults have hypertension (HTN), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death [13]. Fewer than half of individuals with HTN are under control despite widely available and affordable medications [4, 5]. Moreover, rates of poor control and complications are disproportionately high in some racial/ethnic communities, including Asian Americans (AAs) [6, 7]. For example, Jose et al. [8] examined CVD mortality rates by AA subgroup from the Multiple Cause of Death mortality database 2003–2010 from the National Center for Health Statistics and found that the proportionate mortality burden of hypertensive heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, especially hemorrhagic stroke, was higher in every AA subgroup (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) compared to non-Hispanic whites [8].

AAs comprise 5.6% of the US population, corresponding to about 14 million people [9]. They are the fastest growing racial/ethnic minority group and represent a tremendously complex and diverse mix of people [1012]. CVD prevention and HTN management programs that enable lifestyle changes and enhance linkage to healthcare are an effective method of promoting HTN control [13]. For example, consuming less sodium and more fruits and vegetables and increasing access to healthy foods are important components to reducing the risk of chronic diseases include HTN and CVD [1416]. There is, however, a lack of culturally adapted programs and educational materials to promote HTN management or healthful behavioral changes for AAs, and existing programs are limited in their sustainability and scalability [1719]. Further, population- and evidence-based CVD prevention and management strategies, which have demonstrated a positive impact in the overall population [20], may not be effective at reaching racial/ethnic minorities [2123]. Research on the effectiveness of evidence-based approaches on increasing AA healthy behaviors is limited [24, 25] but suggests a “mismatch” [26] between the general population for whom the strategy was developed and validated and the AA community [27]. There is also substantial diversity in cultural beliefs, language, and socioeconomic status among AAs [28, 29], which have been shown to impede successful implementation of evidence-based strategies [3032]. Thus, in order to achieve a significant public health impact, benefits of proven lifestyle interventions must be translated to community settings in a culturally sensitive and sustainable manner [17, 2023, 25, 3340].

Faith-based organizations (FBOs) represent one such community setting for the implementation of health promotion and prevention strategies in AA communities. According to a nationwide survey of AAs conducted by the Pew Research Center [41], AAs are more religiously diverse than the US population and report substantial differences in religious affiliation across and within AA subgroups, as well as have a high level of weekly engagement with FBOs [41, 42]. Previous studies indicate that FBOs are natural partners for the delivery of health promotion programs due to a number of factors, including their role as community centers; access to large segments of the population, especially underserved groups; supportive infrastructure (e.g., health ministries, communication channels, regularity of contact); presence of support networks (e.g., prayer groups); and personnel resources (e.g., volunteers, lay leaders, and champions) [4347]. For example, findings from the 2012 National Congregations Study indicate that 28% of FBOs deliver organized health-focused programs (e.g., health education classes, cooking classes) [48]. Despite the potential for establishing health promotion interventions through FBOs [49], few have been implemented in FBOs serving AA congregants [5054]. Moreover, the majority of these interventions have been limited to changing individual-level behaviors with little or no emphasis on implementing corresponding reinforcing strategies at the organizational level.

The goal of this paper is to describe the efforts of a multi-sector coalition representing diverse AA communities in New York City and New Jersey (NYC/NJ) to adapt and implement multi-level strategies to address HTN control, HTN management, and CVD prevention. Specifically, these strategies have been culturally adapted and integrated to enhance community fit, preferences, and priorities for sustainable implementation. We present baseline results and describe the adaptation process for the implementation of (1) environmental and policy strategies to improve access to healthy foods and beverages and (2) a volunteer-led blood pressure monitoring program in FBO settings in NYC/NJ.

METHODS

Project description

Building upon a substantial history of community-engaged health promotion and prevention efforts in the AA community [5557], the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health for Asian Americans (REACH FAR) program is guided by a multi-sector coalition consisting of a lead academic agency, four community-based organizations (CBOs) and groups representing the Asian Indian, Bangladeshi, Filipino, and Korean communities in NYC/NJ, and state and local health departments. Coalition partners leveraged their deep roots in the community, bolstered with technical assistance, training, and resources, to further engage 12 FBO sites in health promotion and prevention strategies. Coalition partners are described in Table 1 below and elsewhere [40, 5566].

Table 1.

REACH FAR coalition partners, NYC/NJ 2014–2017

Coalition partner Description
NYU Center for the Study of Asian American Health (NYU CSAAH) (Lead agency) National Institute of Health-funded research center of excellence dedicated to research, training, and partnership development to address health disparities in Asian American communities
Diabetes Research, Education, and Action for Minorities (DREAM) Project Partnership between social service agencies, academic partners, and health care organizations that seek to improve the health status of NYC Bangladeshis that has implemented initiatives focused on diabetes, breast cancer, and health access
Kalusugan Coalition, Inc. (KC) CBO with a mission to improve the health of the Filipino community in the NY/NJ area through network and resource development, educational activities, research, community action, and advocacy
Korean Community Services of Metropolitan NY, Inc. (KCS) CBO with a mission to support and assist the Korean community to improve the quality of their lives to be healthy and productive individuals through a broad range of professional social services programs in the areas of Aging, Community, and Public Health.
UNITED SIKHS (US) Social service and advocacy organization with a mission to transform underprivileged and minority communities and individuals into informed and vibrant members of society through civic, educational and personal development programs
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) Primary Care Information Project Community Engagement Division, NYC DOHMH Center for Health Equity, which was specifically engaged in REACH FAR, with a mission to strengthen and amplify the NYC DOHMH’s work to eliminate health inequities, which are rooted in historical and contemporary injustices and discrimination, including racism

The coalition worked with FBO sites to implement multi-level strategies that addressed both organizational change and individual and interpersonal behavior change to support HTN prevention and management. At the organizational level, the REACH FAR coalition worked with FBO sites to implement environmental and policy change to increase access to heart healthy foods and beverages served during congregation meals. These changes included the introduction of one or more of the following options during communal meals: (1) one fruit choice, (2) one leafy green salad or fresh vegetable, (3) one whole grain option (e.g., brown rice, whole wheat naan), (4) water availability at no charge at meal time, (5) 1% or non-fat milk/yogurt, and (5) low-sodium dressings/condiments (e.g., soy sauce, lemon, salad dressing). To facilitate community-clinical linkages and to increase individual-level awareness of the importance of blood pressure control, the FBO sites also implemented a NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) program, “Keep on Track” (KOT), which is an evidence-based train-the-trainer, volunteer-led blood pressure monitoring program [67] open to all male and female congregant members who are between the ages of 18 and 85 years and not pregnant at the time of recruitment. To date, NYC DOHMH has implemented KOT in 120 FBOs and CBOs across NYC but not in any AA-serving organizations. FBOs were identified by the three community coalition partners based on their existing relationships, established partnerships, coalition group discussions, and one-on-one meetings with the FBO leadership to determine the site’s interest and feasibility to implement the strategies.

Guiding frameworks

REACH FAR is guided by translation research, a broad domain that encompasses both cultural adaptation and implementation research [6871]. Implementation research seeks to understand the processes and factors that are associated with successful integration of evidence-based interventions within a particular setting, including how the intervention was adapted to the local context or setting [70]. Cultural adaptation is defined as the systematic modification of an evidence-based program to consider language, culture, and context in such a way that it is compatible with that of the target population’s cultural patterns meanings and values [72], while maintaining scientific integrity [35, 73]. Given the current diversity of the US population, cultural adaptation is an important part of the implementation process [74], and attention to how cultural factors affect the delivery and implementation of health promotion strategies, including in faith-based settings, is crucial. Moreover, meta-analyses of cultural adapted interventions—adaptations that explicitly integrate cultural factors such as language, cultural beliefs, and explanatory models—show improved relevance, acceptability, effectiveness, and sustainability of the interventions [7578].

The adaptation process was informed by the Ecological Validity Model (EVM) [72], which specifies eight domains for cultural adaptation of the implementation program: language, persons, metaphors, content, concepts, goals, methods, and context. Two complementary approaches, social marketing and community-based participatory research (CBPR), were used to support the adaptation process. Social marketing [79, 80], identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a key framework in the dissemination of evidence-based health promotion practices [81, 82], is the application of principles drawn from the commercial sector to influence a target audience to engage in beneficial behavioral change for health promotion [8385]. Social marketing principles were applied to increase relevancy to cultural norms and knowledge and to identify appropriate messaging, meaning, and channels across the eight EVM domains and to ensure strategies are easy to adopt and integrate into current practice in faith-based settings across denominations and organizational structures. For example, we worked with coalition partners to determine the costs and benefits of healthy eating behavior change for our audience and integrated these concepts where it was appropriate. Finally, we applied the principles of CBPR, an approach in which community stakeholders with various knowledge and expertise partner to understand community concerns and develop action-oriented solutions to address them [86], by partnering with trusted AA-serving CBOs and coalitions. Using a CBPR approach to cultural adaptation and implementation research decreases the gap between research and practice and thus may increase the intervention relevance and true uptake into everyday use in real-world settings [69, 87].

Prior to strategy implementation, a series of organizational-level and individual-level assessments were collected at the 12 FBO sites, including (i) FBO environmental strategy checklists (n = 12); (ii) congregant surveys assessing social norms, attitudes, and access to healthy foods and beverages (n = 946); and (iii) KOT program baseline surveys conducted with congregants enrolled into the KOT program (n = 725). To assess the adaptation and implementation process, community partner in-depth interviews (n = 5) and a review of REACH FAR meeting minutes were conducted.

Organizational and individual baseline assessments: methods and measures

FBO environmental strategy checklists

The checklists were implemented by coalition partners, who underwent an in-person group training on the tool, by on-site observation, and assessment of nutritional policies at each FBO. We assessed congregation size, denomination, and existence of health programming, promotion, and/or health-focused groups and funding at the FBO, such as a wellness coordinator or committee. Measures were adapted from the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) [88]. See Appendix for the checklist.

Congregant surveys

These surveys assessing congregation norms, attitudes, and access to healthy foods and beverages, and included a self-report measure of overall diet, availability of healthy foods at communal meals (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, free water, low-fat or non-fat dairy, and lower salt condiments), difficulty choosing healthy food options at communal meals, and communal meals serving healthy options. Measures were adapted from the New York City Food Standards [89] and from the Perceived Nutrition Environment Survey (NEMS-P) [90]. Surveys were collected anonymously at each FBO site by trained bilingual research interns working closely with coalition partners during a weekly service using a purposive sampling strategy. All congregant members over 18 years of age were eligible to participate.

KOT program baseline surveys

All congregant members who met KOT program eligibility criteria (between 18 and 85 years and not pregnant at the time of recruitment) were invited to participate in the KOT program evaluation through recruitment events held before or after regular FBO services. These consented participants completed baseline surveys which included questions related to HTN diagnosis and HTN medication prescription, the eight-question Morisky Medication Scale [91], and self-efficacy related to accessing healthcare. Individual clinical measures were collected on the survey and include height, weight (self-reported), and blood pressure. BP readings were taken with the Omron Model BP785 [92] by trained volunteers. KOT program participants enrolled into the evaluation study received a $5 incentive.

Both surveys included sociodemographic questions: year of birth (used to calculate age), sex, country of birth, and years in the USA. Measures were culturally adapted in partnership with the coalition as needed. For example, traditional Asian fruits and vegetables were included in the checklist. These surveys were available in English and translated into Bengali, Tagalog, Korean, and Punjabi and administered in-person by trained, bilingual research intern surveyors. Each translation was reviewed by a second bilingual translator and by the coalition partners and discrepancies addressed via a consensus process.

Multi-level strategy adaptation and implementation assessment: methods and measures

Community partner in-depth interviews and coalition meeting minutes

One-hour, tape-recorded in-person interviews were conducted by an external consultant with ten community coalition partners. The interview topic guide assessed project feasibility, including identification and assessment of FBO implementation sites and their leadership structure, as well as the adaptation and implementation process. Measures related to the eight categories of the EVM framework were also assessed [72]. To further supplement the data, we compiled meeting minutes from 189 in-person and telephone meetings conducted with coalition partners over a 21-month span.

All REACH FAR procedures and activities conducted with human participants were reviewed by the NYU School of Medicine IRB and approved as an expedited study.

Analysis

Quantitative

Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize demographic variables and additional health and nutrition variables. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables, and frequency and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. Significant differences across Asian subgroups were determined using chi-square analyses for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 21.0. A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Qualitative

Meeting minutes and in-depth interview transcripts were independently reviewed and coded using ATLAS.ti 6 (Scientific Software Development GmbH) by the lead and senior author, and key themes related to the implementation and adaption process were extracted using a constant comparative approach [93]. Reviewers resolved discrepancies in key themes through a consensus process. Themes were shared, reviewed, and refined based on feedback from the multi-sector coalition.

RESULTS

Organizational and individual baseline assessments

Table 2 presents the characteristics of the FBOs. The majority of congregants at Sikh gurdwaras were Asian Indians, while the majority of congregants at Muslim mosques were Bangladeshi. Mainline Protestant churches included a majority of Korean congregants, while Evangelical Protestant churches included a substantial proportion of Filipinos.

Table 2.

Characteristics of REACH FAR faith-based organizations, NYC/NJ 2014–2017

Religious denomination FBO religious affiliation Ethnic subgroups represented Congregation size
Sikh Gurdwaras (3) Asian Indian 1400
Muslim Mosques (2) Bangladeshi 2050
Senior center co-located in a mosque (1) Bangladeshi 150
Mainline Protestant Presbyterian churches (2) Korean 1900
Methodist church (1) Korean 1100
Evangelical Protestant Baptist church (1) Filipino 90
Seventh Day Adventist church (1) Filipino 100
Non-denominational Christian church (1) Filipino 86

FBO environmental strategy checklists

Table 3 presents data on the environmental and organizational policies that support access to healthy foods and beverages by FBO denomination. All Evangelical Protestant churches and Sikh gurdwaras reported providing congregation-level health promotion activities, such as health fairs or walking clubs. Additionally, two of the Evangelical Protestant churches had a mission or formal policy statement that includes the support of and/or commitment to congregant health and well-being. Few sites labeled foods that were healthy or had signs or posters promoting healthy eating.

Table 3.

REACH FAR faith-based organization environmental strategy checklist: environmental and policy nutrition measures, NYC/NJ 2014–2017

Mosques (n = 3) Evangelical Protestant churches (n = 3) Mainline Protestant churches (n = 3) Gurdwaras (n = 3)
Site provides health promotion activities for their congregants (e.g., health fairs, screenings, walking clubs, etc.) 33% 100% 33% 100%
Site has a wellness/health coordinator 33% 33% 33% 0%
Site has a wellness/health committee 33% 33% 0% 0%
Site has a health promotion budget 33% 0% 0% 0%
Site has a mission statement (or written policy statement) that includes support of or commitment to congregant health and well-being 33% 67% 0% 0%
Site labels foods that are healthy (e.g., low sugar, low salt, heart healthy) 33% 0% 0% 0%
Site has signs or posters promoting healthy eating (e.g., eat lower sodium/low-fat foods, eat more fruits and vegetables) 33% 0% 67% 0%

Congregant surveys

Table 4 presents select baseline characteristics of the congregants by AA subgroup related to social norms, attitudes, and access to healthy foods and beverages. Overall, respondents had a mean age of 50.6 (SD = 17.2) and 57% were female; 88% were foreign-born. For respondents born outside the US, mean years lived in the US was 18.8 (SD = 11.9). Mean BMI was 25.0 (SD = 5.0), and 10% had a BMI ≥30.0. Overall, 14% reported their diet as fair or poor; Bangladeshis (14%) and Asian Indians (25%) were most likely to report their diet as fair or poor (p < 0.001). Koreans were less likely than the other groups to report that their FBO settings usually or always provided healthy options such as fruit, fresh vegetables, free water, and low-fat or non-fat dairy. Korean congregants, however, reported that their FBO sites were most likely to usually or always have lower salt condiments available. Additionally, Koreans were most likely to answer that it was difficult to choose healthy options at communal meals and that healthy options were not served at the communal meals. All differences across subgroups were statistically significant.

Table 4.

REACH FAR faith-based organization congregant survey select findings on social norms, attitudes, and access to healthy foods and beverages NYC/NJ, 2014–2017

Bangladeshi (n = 159) Filipino (n = 207) Korean (n = 409) Asian Indian (n = 171) p value Total sample (n = 946)
Female 28% 58% 71% 49% <0.001 57%
Age (years), mean ± SD 56.2 ± 13.6 45.6 ± 16.1 55.5 ± 17.1 41.7 ± 16.2 <0.001 50.6 ± 17.2
Foreign-born 99% 85% 95% 65% <0.001 88%
Time in the USA (years), mean ± SD 10.0 ± 9.5 15.7 ± 10.8 22.2 ± 11.4 21.8 ± 11.6 <0.001 18.8 ± 11.9
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD 26.5 ± 5.8 24.5 ± 4.2 23.9 ± 5.1 26.7 ± 4.3 <0.001 25.0 ± 5.0
BMI categories <0.001
 <25.0 48% 61% 69% 31% 57%
 25.0–29.99 37% 29% 24% 57% 33%
 ≥30.0 15% 10% 7% 12% 10%
How healthy is your overall diet? <0.001
 Excellent/very good 22% 47% 50% 19% 39%
 Good 64% 37% 41% 56% 47%
 Fair/poor 14% 16% 9% 25% 14%
It is difficult for me to choose healthy food options at community meals at my place of worship—agree 45% 22% 55% 31% <0.001 42%
Available—usually or always
 Fruit 64% 80% 11% 70% <0.001 46%
 Fresh vegetable 75% 76% 24% 77% <0.001 52%
 Whole grain 20% 57% 38% 67% <0.001 45%
 Free water 96% 94% 79% 95% <0.001 88%
 Low-fat or non-fat dairy 45% 34% 17% 47% <0.001 31%
 Lower salt condiments 32% 27% 67% 56% <0.001 50%

KOT program baseline surveys

Baseline characteristics and measures related to BP management of each AA subgroup and the overall sample for participants enrolled in the KOT program are summarized in Table 5. Overall, participants had a mean age of 56.5 years (SD = 15.0), 60% were female, and the majority were foreign-born (97%). Of those born outside the US, mean years in the US was 18.7 (SD = 12.6). Mean systolic BP was 127.5 (SD = 17.8), and mean diastolic BP was 80.0 (SD = 11.6). In terms of clinical variables, Koreans had the highest mean systolic BP and Asian Indians had the highest mean diastolic BP; Bangladeshis were most likely to present as hypertensive. Overall, 42% had been told by a health professional that they have high BP; this was highest among Bangladeshis (58%, <0.001). Of those told they had high BP, 89% had been prescribed medication to control BP; this was lowest among Asian Indian and Filipinos (82 and 84%, respectively, p = 0.058). Of those prescribed BP medication, 93% were currently taking medication. Medication adherence was similar among AA subgroups; among those taking BP medication, the score was 2.51 (SD = 1.89), indicating medium medication adherence (0 = high adherence, 11 = poor adherence).

Table 5.

Keep on Track Program participants’ baseline characteristics

Bangladeshi (n = 156) Filipino (n = 151) Korean (n = 264) Asian Indian (n = 154) p value Total sample (n = 725)
Female 43% 64% 69% 58% <0.001 60%
Age (years), mean ± SD 55.7 ± 13.0 48.6 ± 14.8 64.0 ± 12.8 52.0 ± 14.8 <0.001 56.5 ± 15.0
Foreign-born 100% 87% 100% 99% <0.001 97%
Time in the USA (years), mean ± SD 10.2 ± 10.1 17.5 ± 11.4 24.5 ± 12.1 15.2 ± 10.1 <0.001 18.7 ± 12.6
SBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 128.3 ± 18.9 120.7 ± 17.5 130.1 ± 17.0 128.5 ± 16.8 <0.001 127.5 ± 17.8
DBP (mmHg), mean ± SD 80.6 ± 11.9 77.1 ± 14.2 79.4 ± 10.0 83.3 ± 10.1 <0.001 80.0 ± 11.6
Hypertension categories <0.001
 Hypertensive 33% 17% 31% 29% 29%
 Pre-hypertensive 40% 35% 45% 41% 41%
 Normal 27% 48% 24% 30% 30%
Had BP taken by a health professional in past year 96% 84% 85% 90% 0.002 89%
Visited a doctor for a routine checkup in past year 96% 78% 80% 89% <0.001 85%
Told that you have high BP 58% 35% 42% 33% <0.001 42%
Prescribed medication to control BP (of those told high BP) 94% 84% 92% 82% 0.058 89%
Currently taking medication for high BP (of those prescribed) 93% 93% 95% 91% 0.828 93%
Medication adherence scale, mean ± SD (0–11, lower = better adherence) (of those taking BP medication) 2.64 ± 2.03 2.41 ± 1.74 2.48 ± 2.02 2.43 ± 1.47 0.910 2.51 ± 1.89

Adaptation and implementation process of multi-level health promotion strategies assessment

All FBO sites offer a communal meal to congregants. Although the frequency and timing vary by denomination and site, coalition partners expressed that the meals offer an opportunity to improve access to healthy foods within these settings. Based on New York City Food Standards created by the NYC DOHMH [89], a list of nutrition policies was adapted to implement during communal meals at FBOs. The list was created through consensus-building across community partners and the FBOs, prioritized, and culturally adapted to be meaningful and relevant across all denominations and AA subgroups. As stated by a partner, “We tried to pick strategies that would be easier for our community to adapt.” All 12 FBOs agreed that at least one if not more of these policies would be implemented during their communal meal: (1) at least one fruit choice be available, (2) at least one leafy green salad or fresh vegetable be available, (3) at least one whole grain option be available (e.g., brown rice, whole wheat naan), (4) water available at no cost at meal time, (5) offer 1% or non-fat dairy items, and (6) offer low-sodium dressings/condiments (e.g., soy sauce, lemon, salad dressing).

Each of the 12 FBO sites was also engaged to implement the adapted KOT program. The structure of the KOT program has been described elsewhere but broadly consists of NYC DOHMH-led training of volunteers in FBO settings to lead monthly BP screenings for their congregants [94, 95]. As part of the KOT program implementation, coalition partners worked with FBO leadership in identifying and recruiting 4–10 volunteers to receive the 6–8 hour NYC DOHMH-led training [96]. Upon completion, coalition partners worked with FBO leadership and KOT volunteers to hold the first KOT BP screening event at the FBO, as well as schedule regular screening events. All FBOs decided to hold KOT events after regular FBO services, although the timing and regularity differed by group. For instance, one Korean church held KOT events once a month on Sunday mornings as part of their regular health programming while a Bangladeshi mosque held events on Friday evenings after their large Jummah service. At initial KOT events, trained FBO volunteers explained the KOT program and evaluation study to congregants. All congregants participating in the program received a BP screening from the FBO volunteer, counseling on ways to prevent and/or control their BP, and a pocket-size BP tracker with the reading from the initial event to personally track their BP readings to share with their provider.

All adaptations were guided and implemented using an iterative process to apply the EVM framework [72] by coalition partners supported through in-person and phone meetings and via cross-coalition meetings. Social marketing principles, including the concepts of the cost and benefits of healthy eating behavior change, were used to help tailor messaging and the promotion of strategies. Strategy adaptions and modifications were identified and discussed at regularly scheduled team meetings. Efforts were made to standardize modifications across the AA subgroups. Because multi-level strategies were being implemented in each FBO setting, adaptions were made to strategies that were applied at both the organizational level (through the policy changes) as well as the interpersonal and individual level (through the KOT program). Cultural adaptations are presented below and in Table 6. See Appendix for an example of an adapted plate planner.

Table 6.

Cultural adaptations using the Ecological Validity Model for REACH FAR strategies

Culturally sensitive domain Adaptations Examples from the KOT Program Adaptation Examples from Nutrition Policy Adaptation
Language All program materials were translated to 4 languages Translation of Blood pressure “tracking” card Translation of nutrition posters
Persons Community and FBO leaders were engaged for program and policy implementation Volunteer trainers were members of FBOs Utilized kitchen staff from Korean churches for nutrition education and implementation
Metaphors Asian and, where relevant, Asian ethnic subgroup-specific idioms and colloquial phrases were incorporated throughout An existing document on blood pressure control used the metaphor “Blood Pressure Control—It’s in Your Court,” which community partners expressed would not resonate with Asian individuals Outreach materials to support nutritional campaigns were designed to address Asian condiments and spice mixes as the source of sodium in the diet
Content Cultural values to frame goals and activities, e.g., the importance of traditional and cultural foods and dishes explicitly acknowledged Training materials and health education materials also included images of Asian men and women to ensure materials were reflective of the audiences, including images of men and women in traditional and mainstream dress Outreach materials included posters that highlighted a medley of fruits and vegetables as important in health promotion, including traditional Asian fruits and vegetables common across the subgroups, e.g., bitter melon, guava, cabbage, and starfruit
Concepts The goal of maintaining one’s individual health for the health of the family—or family harmony and the idea of collectivism was integrated. Traditional foods and dishes used to highlight healthy diets Training materials incorporated counseling for participants which emphasized engaging in health promotion activities with family and social networks Incorporated the concept of seva to the Sikh community in promotion of healthy food to serve during langar (shared communal meals) in gurdwaras
Goals Program goals were bolstered with messaging and framing around collectivism and group harmony In the Seventh Day Adventist Filipino church, the congregation and leadership shared explicit goals around healthful behavior into their daily practice; this messaging was aligned to KOT program goals Health education materials incorporated Bible scripture and utilized Bible study guide templates to discuss healthy eating and blood pressure monitoring
Methods Program activities or procedures were adapted. Given strong leadership and respect for faith leaders, incorporated guidelines, and protocols to enhance faith leadership engagement in the program Pastors and gurdwara leaders were encouraged to enroll in the KOT study and to incorporate project information through FBO-wide announcements Nutrition policies in mosques were implemented to align with the month of Ramadan, when FBOs provide daily iftar (breakfast) at sundown to celebrate the breaking of fast by incorporating healthy food options during the meal. In Korean and Filipino churches and Sikh gurdwaras, changes were introduced at weekly meal services and adapted if meals were prepared on-site or donated by congregants
Context Contextual issues were incorporated into program and policy procedures Linked congregants to health providers who accepted a variety of insurances and low-cost sliding fee scales Healthy traditional foods or traditional foods with heart healthy modifications were promoted

Languages

The KOT program materials were translated into four languages: Korean, Bangla, Punjabi, and Tagalog. Translated program materials included the KOT Training Manuals for program volunteers, NYC DOHMH health education materials for program participants and congregants, and program materials that are used to track participation in the program, including BP Tracking Cards and Participant Record Cards. Translation involved an iterative process in group discussions and team meetings with NYC DOHMH, community partners, and a certified translation company. In support of the organizational-level nutrition policies implemented at each site, outreach translated materials including posters and banners were created that highlighted messages to support heart healthy foods.

Persons

A critical element in the implementation of both the KOT and nutrition policies at FBO sites was the engagement of trusted community leaders and gatekeepers within the FBO settings that was reflective of the largely first-generation immigrant congregation of each site. In each community, partners met with FBO leadership to foster engagement and support for health promotion in faith settings and their approval for the nutritional policy and KOT implementation process. Within each FBO setting, leadership structures varied; for example, gurdwaras (Sikh houses of worship) are led by a committee which acts as the decision-making body in overseeing programmatic activities. Some of the Korean churches are comprised of various ministries (e.g., a Health Ministry) which made the decisions on nutrition implementation efforts. For the KOT program specifically, which relies on peer volunteers to deliver the regular BP screening and counseling to congregants, two levels of community leaders were engaged in the program. First, partners identified consultants for the program who were trained by the NYC DOHMH using a train-the-trainer module. Consultants were chosen based on their history of engagement in the target community, ability to speak the target language, and relationships with FBO and other community institutions. Their DOH training bolstered their already existing cultural license to introduce the KOT program to congregations. Second, consultants identified existing health ministry members or other active volunteers in each site who were trained to administer the monthly screening and counseling program.

Metaphors

In translating health education materials, partners engaged in an interactive process of incorporating Asian-specific idioms and cultural colloquialisms into materials that would support health promotion (e.g., in the Bengali language materials, the concept of “niyom” or routine, which has been identified in previous work as supportive of health promotion efforts, was incorporated into KOT training manuals and coaching materials) [97]. Conversely, partners also adapted or removed English language metaphors that were not relevant.

Content

Content was adapted across all materials for both the KOT program and in support of nutritional policies implemented in FBO settings. Specifically, all training materials, health education materials, and outreach materials were edited to remove foods not eaten by the community and explicitly acknowledged the value of traditional cultural dishes and incorporated healthy traditional foods or dishes or heart healthy modifications of these dishes. As stated by a coalition partner about adapted the NYC DOHMH materials and other sources, “Anything that wasn’t relevant to the community, we switched out.”

Concept

Asian cultural concepts related to collectivism, community, and the centrality of the family unit were incorporated into program materials and messaging. For example, nutritional and hypertension educational sessions and events were held during family nights at Bangladeshi mosques, and culturally adapted materials included tips for grandparents and caretakers. Efforts to support nutritional strategy implementation highlighted modifying traditional Asian diets to be heart healthy.

Goals

In engaging faith partners for both parts of the intervention, program goals were aligned closely with the mission and teachings of each setting. The Sikh religion emphasizes the concepts of seva or service to the community as part of their faith. In Sikh gurdwaras, communal meals are donated by congregation members and often hosts health-related activities such as health fairs to improve the health of the community. The gurdwara committee members were educated on the importance of the health promotion strategies and how the REACH FAR strategies aligned with seva or as a service to their community.

Methods

Across all the faith settings and groups, coalition partners emphasized that faith leaders are highly respected and community gatekeepers. Thus, we incorporated guidelines and protocols to enhance faith leadership engagement in both strategies. For example, a series of faith leader engagement meetings were conducted prior to program and policy implementation; memorandums of understanding were jointly developed and reviewed by coalition partners and faith leaders; and leadership was recruited to make announcements in support of program activities during weekly congregation prayers and services. As stated by a coalition partner when describing the implementation process, “We started contacting the church leaders first because that’s where the approval comes from. They’re also able to bring things to the head pastor. We started there.” In addition, program activities or procedures were adapted to address cultural and religious norms and the context of religious service and events. For example, in mosque settings, the KOT procedures for conducting BP screenings were adapted to accommodate modesty concerns for Muslim women by setting up a separate station for the female congregants.

Context

Finally, the KOT program addressed contextual issues related to congregations’ immigrant status, including undocumented status, and the work context of congregants across settings. Referral information was distributed included sliding scale or low-cost resources for immigrants who did not qualify for state or federal health insurance programs.

DISCUSSION

REACH FAR represents a unique multi-sector (academic, community, faith, and municipal health sectors) partnership to ensure local and community sustainability. Practice-based adoption and sustainability is greatly strengthened by using a community-led and community embedded program approach. By implementing and fostering collaboration with the NYC DOHMH, we are further enhancing impact on public health practice. The REACH FAR faith-based strategies represent low-resource sustainable activities delivered by trained congregant volunteers using a collaborative partnership approach to further sustain efforts and enhance community capacity and translation into public health practice. As we are able to assess outcomes across denominations, across AA ethnic subgroups, and congregation size and structure, there is high potential for generalizability and dissemination to other AA-serving FBOs.

Findings from this study present encouraging evidence for the role of FBOs for health promotion and suggest that adapting existing interventions for cultural, linguistic, and organizational/setting-level characteristics using a community-engaged and capacity building approach can result in successful implementation and uptake of health promotion strategies.

Significant modifications and adaptations to the strategies were necessary to ensure relevancy and successful implementation in these underserved communities, underscoring that there exist substantial gaps in translational research. Our study reinforces the growing evidence base in the dissemination and implementation literature that calls for meaningful, well-designed interventions attuned to the needs of diverse audiences, applicable and acceptable for real-world, community-based settings, and scalable for significant reach [69, 98104]. Implementation research methods aim to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and evidence-based practices into routine practice [105]. The use of cultural adaptation models in implementation science can enhance relevancy, acceptability, and appropriateness of evidence-based programs to the needs and preferences of diverse populations [76]. Our use of a systematic approach of applying the EVM to the cultural adaptation process adds to the knowledge base. Further, incorporating a CBPR approach ensures meaningful engagement of stakeholders and that strategy adaptations are culturally appropriate for the target communities.

Two review articles of FBO health promotion interventions include no examples of intervention studies targeting AA FBOs or congregants [43, 46]. Moreover, our study findings highlight that within our sample, FBOs may be underutilized as sites to encourage healthy environment (e.g., mission or policy statements, labeling providing or labeling healthy food options) and for behavioral health promotion and activities. The majority of the REACH FAR implementation sties did not have the resources or infrastructure for systematic health promotion activities. Furthermore, individual-level findings underscore the need for HTN prevention and control interventions targeting AA-serving FBOs. Both self-reported and measured blood pressure and BMI rates for congregants across the four communities align with or exceed those reported in other published studies [106108], demonstrating that faith-based settings are an appropriate venue for reaching Asian individuals at high risk for CVD. Despite yearly improvements in CVD mortality rates among non-Hispanic whites, AA subgroups have not shared in the improvements. Jose et al. [8] suggest that CVD prevention and management messages and campaigns may not be effectively reaching this population, highlighting the need to implement strategies that are low-cost, easy to use, culturally relevant, and can successfully reach these underserved population. Our future work will evaluate the efficacy of the multi-level strategies implemented in FBO settings to improve BP control and nutritional practices of congregants. Finally, a key contribution of our study is that findings can guide future implementation efforts in AA FBO settings. Given that there is limited research that has examined FBOs as an appropriate place for intervention with AAs, our study provides important information on how implementation processes vary across diverse AA FBOs given the cultural and structural context of sites across subgroup communities.

Limitations

REACH FAR is a community-based study implemented in self-selected FBOs; thus, finding may not be generalizable across all AA-serving FBOs. Furthermore, our study is being conducted in 12 FBOs, a relatively small sample size, which limits the statistical power to detect differences in group. The implementation program, however, is conducted across four AA subgroups, across denominations, and organizational structures. By collecting FBO organizational data on capacity and existing health promotion activities, this paper adds to the knowledge base on strategies to support uptake and sustainability of faith-based health promotion activities. Our findings provide encouraging evidence for and much needed information on the translation of evidence-based programs for underserved communities.

CONCLUSIONS

Faith-based health promotion initiatives can provide access to people who disproportionately experience poor health outcomes and are not reached by mainstream or traditional health care channels. Our preliminary findings suggest REACH FAR is a promising implementation research study that is feasible and acceptable in FBO settings. Future work which evaluates the efficacy of multi-level strategies to impact health outcomes and behaviors related to CVD may have wider implications for public health practice for underserved AAs and other populations.

Acknowledgements

This publication is supported by grant numbers U58DP005621 and U48DP005008 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), P60MD000538 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and UL1TR001445 from NCATS/NIH. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH and CDC. The authors thank the following organizations for their partnership, collaboration, and dedication: The Diabetes Research, Education, and Action for Minorities Coalition, Kalusugan Coalition Inc., Korean Community Service of Metropolitan NY Inc., UNITED SIKHS, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the New Jersey Department of Health, the New York State Department of Health Office of Minority Health, and the 12 faith-based organizations implementation sites.

Appendix

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figa_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figb_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figca_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figcb_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figcc_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figcd_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figce_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figcf_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figcg_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figch_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 13142_2017_506_Figci_HTML.jpg

Compliance with ethical standards

Statement on any previous reporting of data

Findings reported in this manuscript have not been previously published. This manuscript is not being simultaneously elsewhere.

Primary data

The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if needed.

Funding

This publication is supported by grant numbers U58DP005621 and U48DP005008 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), P60MD000538 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, and UL1TR001445 from NCATS/NIH. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH and CDC.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This manuscript does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent statement

Informed consent was obtained from all Keep on Track individual participants included in the study. Oral consent was obtained from individuals participating in the nutrition evaluation as no PHI was collected as part of the evaluation. All data presented in this manuscript is deidentified.

Helsinki or comparable standard statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

IRB approval

All REACH FAR procedures and activities conducted with human participants were reviewed by the NYU School of Medicine IRB and approved as an expedited study

Footnotes

Implications

Practice: Faith-based organizations, across religious denominations and congregation size and structures, can serve as key implementation sites for health promotion and disease prevention to reach underserved Asian American populations.

Policy: In general, Asian American-serving faith-based organizations lack organizational-level nutrition policies but are receptive to enacting such policies.

Research: There is a need to systematically adapt evidence-based programs for underserved communities using community-engaged approaches. Future research should identify key organizational-level factors of faith-based organizations to enhance and sustain successful uptake of health promotion strategies and programs.

References

  • 1.Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(4):590–595. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Frieden TR, Berwick DM. The "Million Hearts" initiative—preventing heart attacks and strokes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(13):e27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Understanding Health Disparities among New York City’s Five Counties. 2010.
  • 4.Vital signs: awareness and treatment of uncontrolled hypertension among adults—United States, 2003–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61:703–709. [PubMed]
  • 5.Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Medical care. 2005;43(6):521–530. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163641.86870.af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klatsky AL, Tekawa I, Armstrong MA. Cardiovascular risk factors among Asian Americans. Public Health Reports. 1996;111(Supp 2):62–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mohanty SA, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, Bor DH. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease among Asian Indians in the United States. Journal of general internal medicine. 2005;20(5):474–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40294.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jose PO, Frank AT, Kapphahn KI, et al. Cardiovascular disease mortality in Asian Americans. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(23):2486–2494. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoeffel E, Rastogi S, Kim MO, Shahid H. The Asian population: 2010 Census briefs. Accessed May 3, 2016. 2012.
  • 10.Asian American Federation Census Information Center. http://www.aafny.org/cic/briefs/bangladeshi2013.pdf.
  • 11.US Census. Table 4. Projections of the population by sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States: 2015 to 2010. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012.
  • 12.Yi SS, Kwon SC, Sacks R, Trinh-Shevrin C. Commentary: persistence and health-related consequences of the model minority stereotype for Asian Americans. Ethnicity & Disease. 2016;26(1):133–138. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burke LE, Dunbar-Jacob JM, Hill MN. Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1997;19:239–263. doi: 10.1007/BF02892289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Appel LJ, Brands MW, Daniels SR, et al. Dietary approaches to prevent and treat hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2006;47(2):296–308. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000202568.01167.B6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boeing H, Bechthold A, Bub A, et al. Critical review: vegetables and fruit in the prevention of chronic diseases. European Journal of Nutrition. 2012;51(6):637–663. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0380-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kamphuis CB, Giskes K, de Bruijn GJ, Wendel-Vos W, Brug J, van Lenthe FJ. Environmental determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: a systematic review. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2006;96(4):620–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han HR, Kim KB, Kim MT. Evaluation of the training of Korean community health workers for chronic disease management. Health Education Research. 2007;22(4):513–521. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsui EW, Wang G, Zahler A, Simoyan OM, White MV, McKee M. A multilingual population health management program. The Journal of ambulatory care management. 2013;36(2):140–146. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31828596fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ursua R, Aguilar DE, Wyatt L, et al. A community health worker intervention to improve management of hypertension among Filipino Americans in New York and New Jersey: a pilot study. Ethnicity & Disease. 2014;24(Winter 2014):67–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA. Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annual Review of Public Health. 2006;27:341–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–e31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Merzel C, D’Afflitti J. Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(4):557–574. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.4.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020. 2010.
  • 24.Netto G, Bhopal R, Lederle N, Khatoon J, Jackson A. How can health promotion interventions be adapted for minority ethnic communities? Five principles for guiding the development of behavioural interventions. Health promotion international. 2010;25(2):248–257. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nierkens V, Hartman MA, Nicolaou M, et al. Effectiveness of cultural adaptations of interventions aimed at smoking cessation, diet, and/or physical activity in ethnic minorities. A systematic review. PloS One. 2013;8(10):e73373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen EK, Reid MC, Parker SJ, Pillemer K. Tailoring evidence-based interventions for new populations: a method for program adaptation through community engagement. Evaluation & the health professions. 2013;36(1):73–92. doi: 10.1177/0163278712442536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lew R, Chen WW. Promising practices to eliminate tobacco disparities among Asian American, native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities. Health promotion practice. 2013;14(5 Suppl):6S–9S. doi: 10.1177/1524839913497717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R, Smith P, Bellamy N. Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research. 2002;3(3):241–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1019902902119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Solomon J, Card JJ, Malow RM. Adapting efficacious interventions: advancing translational research in HIV prevention. Evaluation & the health professions. 2006;29(2):162–194. doi: 10.1177/0163278706287344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development. Spotlight: Asian American and Pacific Islander Poverty. 2013. Available at: http://nationalcapacd.org/sites/default/files/u12/aapi_poverty_report-web_compressed.pdf.
  • 31.US Department of Education. White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: Critical Issues Facing Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. 2011. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/list/asian-americans-initiative/criticalissues.html.
  • 32.Li S, Kwon SC, Weerasinghe I, Rey MJ, Trinh-Shevrin C. Smoking among Asian Americans: acculturation and gender in the context of tobacco control policies in New York city. Health promotion practice. 2013;14(5 Suppl):18S–28S. doi: 10.1177/1524839913485757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Burke LE, Dunbar-Jacob JM, Hill MN. Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1997;19(3):239–263. doi: 10.1007/BF02892289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen EK, Reid MC, Parker SJ, Pillemer K. Tailoring evidence-based interventions for new populations: a method for program adaptation through community engagement. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2013;36(1):73–92. doi: 10.1177/0163278712442536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R, Smith P, Bellamy N. Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science. 2002;3(3):241–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1019902902119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lew R, Chen WW. Promising practices to eliminate tobacco disparities among Asian American, native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities. Health Promotion Practice. 2013;14(5 Suppl):6S–9S. doi: 10.1177/1524839913497717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Netto G, Bhopal R, Lederle N, Khatoon J, Jackson A. How can health promotion interventions be adapted for minority ethnic communities? Five principles for guiding the development of behavioural interventions. Health Promotion International. 2010;25(2):248–257. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Solomon J, Card JJ, Malow RM. Adapting efficacious interventions: advancing translational research in HIV prevention. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2006;29(2):162–194. doi: 10.1177/0163278706287344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsui EW, Wang G, Zahler A, Simoyan OM, White MV, McKee M. A multilingual population health management program. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. 2013;36(2):140–146. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e31828596fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ursua RA, Aguilar DE, Wyatt LC, et al. A community health worker intervention to improve management of hypertension among Filipino Americans in New York and New Jersey: a pilot study. Ethnicity & Disease. 2014;24(1):67–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pew Research Center. Asian Americans: A Mosaic of Faiths.http://www.pewforum.org/Asian-Americans-A-Mosaic-of-Faiths.aspx2012.
  • 42.Pew Research Center. Muslim Americans: Middle Class and Mostly Mainstream.http://www.pewresearch.org/2007/05/22/muslim-americans-middle-class-and-mostly-mainstream/2007.
  • 43.Baskin ML, Resnicow K, Campbell MK. Conducting health interventions in black churches: a model for building effective partnerships. Ethnicity & Disease. 2001;11(4):823–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bond KT, Jones K, Ompad DC, Vlahov D. Resources and interest among faith based organizations for influenza vaccination programs. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2013;15(4):758–763. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9645-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bopp M, Fallon EA. Health and wellness programming in faith-based organizations: a description of a nationwide sample. Health Promotion Practice. 2013;14(1):122–131. doi: 10.1177/1524839912446478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Campbell MK, Hudson MA, Resnicow K, Blakeney N, Paxton A, Baskin M. Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007;28:213–234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peterson J, Atwood JR, Yates B. Key elements for church-based health promotion programs: outcome-based literature review. Public Health Nursing. 2002;19(6):401–411. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2002.19602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.National Congregations Study, Cumulative Dataset. 2012 Accessed June 10, 2016.
  • 49.DeHaven MJ, Hunter IB, Wilder L, Walton JW, Berry J. Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94(6):1030–1036. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.6.1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jo AM, Maxwell AE, Choi S, Bastani R. Interest in health promotion among Korean American Seventh-day Adventists attending a religious retreat. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012;13(6):2923–2930. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jo AM, Maxwell AE, Yang B, Bastani R. Conducting health research in Korean American churches: perspectives from church leaders. Journal of Community Health. 2010;35(2):156–164. doi: 10.1007/s10900-009-9213-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ma GX, Gao W, Tan Y, Chae WG, Rhee J. A community-based participatory approach to a hepatitis B intervention for Korean Americans. Progress in Community Health Partnerships. 2012;6(1):7–16. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ma GX, Shive S, Tan Y, et al. Community-based colorectal cancer intervention in underserved Korean Americans. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33(5):381–386. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2009.1010.1001. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 54.Sun A, Bui Q, Tsoh JY, et al. Efficacy of a church-based, culturally tailored program to promote completion of advance directives among Asian Americans. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2016;21:21. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0365-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Trinh-Shevrin C, Kwon SC, Park R, Nadkarni SK, Islam NS. Moving the dial to advance population health equity in New York City Asian American populations. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 3):e16–e25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Trinh-Shevrin C, Islam NS, Nadkarni SK, Park R, Kwon SC. Defining an integrative approach for health promotion and disease prevention: a population health equity framework. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015; 26:Suppl 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Trinh-Shevrin C, Islam NS, Tandon SD, Abesamis N, Hoe-Asjoe H, Rey MJ. Using community-based participatory research as a guiding framework for health disparities research centers. Progress in Community Health Partnerships. 2007;1(2):195–205. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Aguilar DE, Abesamis-Mendoza N, Ursua RA, Divino LA, Cadag K, Gavin NP. Lessons learned and challenges in building a Filipino health coalition. Health Promotion Practice. 2010;11(3):428–436. doi: 10.1177/1524839908326381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Islam NS, Riley L, Wyatt LC, et al. Protocol for the DREAM Project (Diabetes Research, Education, and Action for Minorities): a randomized trial of a community health worker intervention to improve diabetic management and control among Bangladeshi adults in NYC. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Islam NS, Zanowiak JM, Wyatt LC, et al. A randomized-controlled, pilot intervention on diabetes prevention and healthy lifestyles in the New York City Korean community. Journal of Community Health. 2013;38(6):1030–1041. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9711-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Islam NS, Zanowiak JM, Wyatt LC, et al. Diabetes prevention in the New York City Sikh Asian Indian community: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11(5):5462–5486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Korean Community Services of Metropolitan NY Inc. http://www.kcsny.org/en/. 2016.
  • 63.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Center for Health Equity.https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/health/neighborhood-health/center-for-health-equity.page. 2016.
  • 64.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Primary Care Information Project.http://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/providers/electronic-records.page. 2016.
  • 65.Patel S, Kwon SC, Arista P, et al. Using evidence-based policy, systems, and environmental strategies to increase access to healthy food and opportunities for physical activity among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 3):S455–S458. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.United Sikhs. http://www.unitedsikhs.org/. 2016.
  • 67.Truncali A, Dumanovsky T, Stollman H, Angell S. Keep on track: a volunteer-run community-based intervention to lower blood pressure in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2010;58(6):1177–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brownson RC, Jones E. Bridging the gap: translating research into policy and practice. Preventive Medicine. 2009;49(4):313–315. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL. Methods for translating evidence-based behavioral interventions for health-disparity communities. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2013;10:E193. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2008;14(2):117–123. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311888.06252.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tabak RG, Sinclair KA, Baumann AA, et al. A review of diabetes prevention program translations: use of cultural adaptation and implementation research. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5(4):401–414. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0341-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bernal G, Bonilla J, Bellido C. Ecological validity and cultural sensitivity for outcome research: issues for the cultural adaptation and development of psychosocial treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1995;23(1):67–82. doi: 10.1007/BF01447045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Castro FG, Barrera M, Jr, Martinez CR., Jr The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science. 2004;5(1):41–45. doi: 10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cabassa LJ, Baumann AA. A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science. 2013;8:90. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Benish SG, Quintana S, Wampold BE. Culturally adapted psychotherapy and the legitimacy of myth: a direct-comparison meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2011;58(3):279–289. doi: 10.1037/a0023626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Griner D, Smith TB. Culturally adapted mental health intervention: a meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) 2006;43(4):531–548. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Huey SJ, Jr, Polo AJ. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2008;37(1):262–301. doi: 10.1080/15374410701820174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Smith TB, Rodriguez MD, Bernal G. Culture. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2011;67(2):166–175. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.US Department of Health and Human Services. Health Communication and Health Information Technology. 2014. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=18.
  • 80.Frieden TR. Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation. American journal of public health. 2014;104:17–22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gateway to Health Communication & Social Marketing Practice.http://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/toolstemplates/whatishm.html2014.
  • 82.Frieden TR. Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(1):17–22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Harris JR, Cheadle A, Hannon PA, et al. A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices. Preventing chronic disease. 2012;9:E22. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kotler P, Zaltman G. Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing. 1971;35:3–12. doi: 10.2307/1249783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nelson DE, Gallogly M, Pederson LL, Barry M, McGoldrick D, Maibach EW. Use of consumer survey data to target cessation messages to smokers through mass media. American journal of public health. 2008;98(3):536–542. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.090340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bodison SC, Sankare I, Anaya H, et al. Engaging the community in the dissemination, implementation, and improvement of health-related research. Clinical and Translational Science. 2015;8(6):814–819. doi: 10.1111/cts.12342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.University of Pennsylvania. (2016). Nutrition Environment Measures Survey.
  • 89.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. New York City Food Standards.http://www.nyc.gov/html/dfta/downloads/pdf/community/food_standards.pdf. 2011.
  • 90.Green SH, Glanz K. Development of the perceived nutrition environment measures survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015;49(1):50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Medical Care. 1986;24(1):67–74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Omron. Blood pressure monitors. 2016.
  • 93.Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.New York City Department for the Aging Health Promotion Services and New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Keep on Track: Blood Pressure Monitoring Program Training Manual 2008. Available at: https://www1.nyc.gov/html/doh//downloads/pdf/tcny/bp-training-manual.pdf.
  • 95.Cannell T. (2014) New York Monitors Blood Pressure with EHRs. Available at: https://practicalplaybook.org/printpdf/1472.
  • 96.New York City Department for the Aging Health Promotion Services, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Keep on Track: Blood Pressure Monitoring Program Training Manualhttps://www1.nyc.gov/html/doh//downloads/pdf/tcny/bp-training-manual.pdf2008.
  • 97.Islam NS, Tandon SD, Mukherji R, et al. Understanding barriers to and facilitators of diabetes control and prevention in the New York City Bangladeshi community: a mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(3):486–490. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Allen JD, Torres MI, Tom LS, Leyva B, Galeas AV, Ospino H. Dissemination of evidence-based cancer control interventions among Catholic faith-based organizations: results from the CRUZA randomized trial. Implementation Science. 2016;11(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0430-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ammerman A, Smith TW, Calancie L. Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results. Annual Review of Public Health. 2014;35:47–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Education & Behavior. 2013;40(3):257–265. doi: 10.1177/1090198113486805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261–1267. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Green LW. Closing the chasm between research and practice: evidence of and for change. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2014;25(1):25–29. doi: 10.1071/HE13101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Koh HK, Oppenheimer SC, Massin-Short SB, Emmons KM, Geller AC, Viswanath K. Translating research evidence into practice to reduce health disparities: a social determinants approach. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl 1):S72–S80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.167353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science. 2006;1:1–3. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Barnes, P. M., Adams, P. F., & Powell-Griner, E. Health characteristics of the Asian adult population: United States, 2004-2006. Advance Data, 2008(394), 1–22. [PubMed]
  • 107.Patel VV, Rajpatahk S, Karasz A. Bangladeshi immigrants in New York City: a community based health needs assessment of a hard to reach population. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2012;14(5):767–773. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9555-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yi SS, Thorpe L, Zanowiak JM, Trinh-Shevrin C, Islam NS. Clinical characteristics and lifestyle behaviors in a population-based sample of Chinese and South Asian immigrants with hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Translational Behavioral Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES