Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;8:1000. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01068-4

Table 1.

Combined therapeutic outcomes of cis mAb treatments in ssTBI mice or rmTBI mice regimens

TBI-related outcomes Experimental tests Treatment regimen (as used in figures) No of total mice used No of mice each group Pathological and functional outcomes (fold ± SD) Cohen’s d* or z -score effect size** p -value
Combined IgG/Sham Combined Cis mAb/ Sham Cis mAb combined effect size
Selected pathological outcomes
 Cis P-tau Cis P-tau (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 100.7 ± 0.28 11.3 ± 0.25 8.91 ± 0.36 5.99 ≤0.0001
Cis P-tau (hippo.) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 67.8 ± 0.88 5.87 ± 0.19 11.5 ± 0.91 1.98 ≤0.0001
 Trans P-tau Trans P-Tau (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 1.00 ± 0.22 1.00 ± 0.21 1.00 ± 0.23 0.02 >0.05
Trans P-Tau (hippo.) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 1.04 ± 0.24 1.03 ± 0.26 1.01 ± 0.21 0.03 >0.05
Axonal injury Gallyas silver (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 20.8 ± 6.51 1.66 ± 0.58 12.5 ± 6.51 2.26 ≤0.0001
Gallyas silver (hippo.) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 15.2 ± 4.65 1.46 ± 0.56 10.5 ± 4.67 2.21 ≤0.0001
Other tau pathology T22 (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 81.8 ± 0.81 8.98 ± 0.22 9.12 ± 0.83 2.09 ≤0.0001
T22 (hippocampus) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 64.4 ± 0.85 5.85 ± 0.21 11.0 ± 0.87 1.93 ≤0.001
AT8 (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 69.0 ± 0.84 12.3 ± 0.27 5.63 ± 0.89 1.75 ≤0.0001
AT8 (hippocampus) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 63.8 ± 0.81 7.16 ± 0.22 8.91 ± 0.87 1.85 ≤0.0002
AT100 (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 59.8 ± 0.84 7.39 ± 0.22 8.08 ± 0.86 1.71 ≤0.0001
AT100 (hippocampus) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 60.2 ± 0.80 6.56 ± 0.21 9.18 ± 0.81 1.86 ≤0.0003
APP accumulation APP (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 3.82 ± 0.43 1.39 ± 0.19 2.74 ± 0.46 2.09 ≤0.0001
APP (hippocampus) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 2.59 ± 0.46 1.12 ± 0.12 2.30 ± 0.45 1.47 ≤0.006
Neuron inflammation GFAP (cortex) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 1.62 ± 0.13 1.06 ± 0.03 1.52 ± 0.14 1.68 ≤0.0005
GFAP (hippocampus) 5a; 4a; 7a 39 3−4 1.42 ± 0.11 1.03 ± 0.02 1.37 ± 0.11 1.51 ≤0.001
Selected functional outcomes
Sensorimotor coordination defects Ledge test 4a, b; 5a; 6a, b; 7a 99 5−9 2.92 ± 0.38 1.06 ± 0.19 2.74 ± 0.49 0.64** ≤0.0001
String suspension 4a, b; 5a; 6a, b; 7a 99 5−9 3.32 ± 0.66 1.00 ± 0.24 3.34 ± 0.81 0.56** ≤0.0001
Accelerating rotarod 7a 27 9 1.22 ± 0.05 0.90 ± 0.03 1.35 ± 0.04 1.22 ≤0.03
Cognitive loss Novel location recog. 7a 27 9 1.27 ± 0.05 0.91 ± 0.03 1.38 ± 0.05 1.21 ≤0.03
Urinary control Voiding pattern 5a; 7a 42 5-9 1.45 ± 0.09 0.93 ± 0.06 1.56 ± 0.10 0.55** ≤0.002

*Cohen d is classified as small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5), large (d = 0.8), very large (d = 1.2), or huge (d = 2.0). **z-score is a nonparametric alternative to Cohen’s d