Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;19(10):e333. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8411

Table 3.

Program acceptability and feasibility.

Acceptability and feasibility 1-month follow-up 3-month follow-up
Intervention,
n=42
Control,
n=38
P Intervention,
n=38
Control,
n=35
P
I would recommend the text(s) to a friend who was pregnant and smoking, mean (SD) 4.39 (1.09) 3.84 (1.42) .07 4.32 (1.09) 3.74 (1.56) .08
The text(s) was/were helpful in getting me to try to quit smoking, mean (SD) 3.70 (1.29) 3.07 (1.51) .06 4.00 (1.09) 3.12 (1.65) .003a
The texts were a trigger and made me want to smoke, mean (SD) 1.76 (1.22) 1.56 (0.97)
Number of text messages, n (%)

<.001a

.002a

Too many 8 (20.00) 1 (3.45)
5 (17.24) 2 (6.06)

Just the right number 31 (77.50) 15 (51.72)
20 (68.97) 12 (36.36)

Too few 1 (2.50) 13 (44.83)
4 (13.79) 19 (57.58)
Proportion of text messages read, n (%)

100% 31 (77.50) 22 (81.48)

75% 9 (22.50) 3 (11.11)

≤50% 0 (0.00) 2 (7.41)
Liked about the programb, n (%)

Content/information (eg, on harms of smoking) 18 (42.86)

13 (34.21)


Social support/other’s people’s quitting stories 6 (14.29)

3 (7.89)


Reminders 6 (14.29)

2 (5.26)


Encouragement 4 (9.52)

2 (5.26)


Interactive tools (eg, GAME, FACT) 4 (9.52) 5 (13.16)

General liking 4 (9.52)

5 (13.16)


Other (eg, timing, confidence, made accountable) 4 (9.52)

5 (13.16)

Disliked about the programb, n (%)

Nothing 23 (54.76)

20 (52.63)


Technical problems 6 (14.29)

2 (5.26)


Message frequency (eg, too frequent) 3 (7.14)

2 (5.26)


Content (eg, too congratulatory, repetitive) 2 (4.76)

1 (2.63)


Text as trigger 2 (4.76) 0 (0.00)

Other (needed human element, timing) 4 (9.52)

0 (0.00)


Total replies to quit day check-ins, mean (SD) 2.74 (3.29) 3.49 (4.25)

Unsubscribed from the program 2 (4.76) 1 (2.63)

Experienced any technical problems 12 (28.57) 2 (5.26) .006a 5 (13.15) 2 (5.71) .28

aP values are statistically significant.

bParticipants could select multiple reasons.