Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;118(4):2435–2447. doi: 10.1152/jn.00822.2016

Table 1.

AICc values for different subset fits of 2-component model for the different delay conditions (Fig. 3, C–E)

AICc Values
Variables Delay of 4.4 ± 1.6 s Delay of 12 ± 4.2 s Delay of 24.6 ± 8.6 s
k1, k2, σ1, σ2, c −108.7693 −105.3151 −118.7197
k2, σ1, σ2, c −111.2082 −109.6939 −116.9831
k1, k2, σ2, c −113.0134 −109.6211 −122.0581
k1, σ1, σ2, c −113.0158 −109.1693 −122.7968
k1, k2, σ1, c −112.6194 −109.1407 −123.1038
k1, k2, σ1, σ2 −112.9643 −109.6516 −122.9041
k2, σ2, c −114.5551 −113.3359 −120.7412
k1, σ1, c −116.3046 −112.7955 −126.3679
k2, σ1, σ2 −114.1863 −113.3856 −119.8192
k1, σ1, σ2 −116.6134 −112.9063 −126.3411
k1, k2, σ2 −116.5036 −113.3555 −125.3954
k1, k2, σ1 −116.3776 −112.7045 −126.4998
k2, σ2 −117.0791 −116.5468 −123.0667
k1, σ1 −119.5159 −115.9592 −129.5881
k1 −121.2097 −118.7266 −131.3981
k2 −112.8502 −118.0780 −123.6566
σ1 −109.4387 −117.5543 −121.4832
σ2 −105.5674 −117.0642 −118.7197
c −107.0072 −117.0223 −116.9831

Allowing the gain of the local component, k1, to be the sole free parameter consistently resulted in the lowest AICc value (in bold).