Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010 Dec 16;24(1):23–32. doi: 10.1177/0891988710390812

Table 3.

Results of Logistic Regression Analyses

DAFS Variables Sensitivity Specificity Overall Classification Odds Ratio Wald χ2 P Value
Tell time 26.5% 94.1% 61.0% 0.92 4.78 .03
Orientation to date 42.9% 94.1% 69.0% 0.96 9.48 .002
Telephone skills 51.0% 64.02% 57.8% 0.95 6.10 .01
Mailing a letter 51.0% 83.0% 67.6% 0.95 10.12 .001
ID road signs 34.7% 90.6% 63.7% 0.91 5.67 .02
Driving rules 40.8% 86.8% 64.7% 0.97 8.63 .003
ID currency 8.2% 100.0 55.9% 0.24 0.01 ns
Count currency 34.7% 98.1% 6.6% 0.91 5.73 .02
Write check 75.0% 77.4% 76.2% 0.96 5.76 .02
Balance checkbook 81.3% 75.5% 78.2% 0.98 9.82 .002
Shopping (free recall) 81.6% 83.0% 82.4% 0.95 29.59 <.001
Shopping (recognition) 69.4% 90.6% 80.4% 0.95 23.34 <.001
Shopping (with a list) 14.3% 100.0% 58.8% 0.92 3.49 ns
Making change 38.8% 92.5% 66.7% 7.76 11.78 .001

Abbreviations: ns, not statistically significant; AD, Alzheimer disease; DAFS, Direct Assessment of Functional Status.