Table 6. Cross-lagged and autoregressive associations between parents’ positive and critical comments and children’s outcomes.
Mothers | N | β | p | Fathers | N | β | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 M_CC = > T2 EXT | 141 | .01 | .94 | T1 F_CC = > T2 EXT | 157 | .02 | .83 |
T1 EXT = > T2 M_CC | .32 | .002 | T1 EXT = > T2 F_CC | .46 | < .001 | ||
M_CC autoregressive | .18 | .11 | F_CC autoregressive | -.10 | .30 | ||
EXT autoregressive | .66 | < .001 | EXT autoregressive | .67 | < .001 | ||
T1 M_CC = > T2 INT | 141 | .08 | .27 | T1 F_CC = > T2 INT | 157 | -.08 | .37 |
T1 INT = > T2 M_CC | .15 | .15 | T1 INT = > T2 F_CC | .23 | .02 | ||
M_CC autoregressive | .33 | .001 | F_CC autoregressive | .05 | .64 | ||
INT autoregressive | .64 | < .001 | INT autoregressive | .63 | < .001 | ||
T1 M_PC = > T2 EXT | 141 | .03 | .66 | T1 F_PC = > T2 EXT | 157 | -.17 | .002 |
T1 EXT = > T2 M_PC | -.13 | .18 | T1 EXT = > T2 F_PC | -.18 | .07 | ||
M_PC autoregressive | .51 | < .001 | F_PC autoregressive | .32 | < .001 | ||
EXT autoregressive | .67 | < .001 | EXT autoregressive | .65 | < .001 | ||
T1 M_PC = > T2 INT | 141 | -.04 | .44 | T1 F_PC = > T2 INT | 157 | -.20 | .001 |
T1 INT = > T2 M_PC | -.40 | < .001 | T1 INT = > T2 F_PC | -.11 | .21 | ||
M_PC autoregressive | .42 | < .001 | F_PC autoregressive | .35 | < .001 | ||
INT autoregressive | .65 | < .001 | INT autoregressive | .58 | < .001 |
In all of these models, we also included child gender, and depressive symptoms, educational attainment and age of the relevant parent as covariates (for presentational clarity, we do not include these coefficients here). The pattern of significant findings was identical when a categorical research diagnosis of depression was used instead of the continuous measure of depression symptoms (PHQ-9 score).
INT = internalizing (emotional problems), EXT = Externalizing (behavioural problems); M = Mothers, F = Fathers; CC = Critical comments, PC = Positive comments; T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2; autoregressive = T1 variable predicting T2 variable.