Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2017 Jan 17;31(11):1266–1281. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1278740

Table 3.

Statistical comparisons of connected speech measures and standard language measures

Patients Time points All 43 patients Pre vs post 14 non-aphasic post Pre vs post 29 aphasic post Pre vs post 24 aphasic post Post vs 1-month 24 aphasic post Pre vs 1-month
p q p q p q p q p q
Words per minute < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.455 0.546 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.002 0.004 ** 0.039 0.077
Phonological errors (log phw) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.027 0.165 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.130 0.142 0.007 0.044 *
Impaired lexical access (log phw) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.101 0.172 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.001 0.003 ** 0.007 0.044 *
Words per utterance 0.001 0.001 ** 0.364 0.485 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 1.000 1.000
Embeddings (phw) < 0.001 0.009 ** 0.198 0.297 0.015 0.015 * 0.022 0.030 * 1.000 1.000
Morphosyntactic errors (log phw) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.062 0.172 < 0.001 0.001 ** 0.016 0.024 * 0.150 0.180
Proportion closed class < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.094 0.172 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.006 0.012 * 0.110 0.147
Filled pauses (log phw) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 1.000 1.000 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.013 0.022 * 0.022 0.054
False starts (log phw) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.059 0.172 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.040 0.048 * 0.045 0.077
Retraced sequences (log phw) 0.002 0.002 ** 0.093 0.172 0.005 0.006 ** 1.000 1.000 0.018 0.054
Aphasia Quotient (AQ, 100) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.022 0.165 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.001 0.003 ** 0.081 0.121
Boston Naming Test (BNT, 15) < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 1.000 1.000 < 0.001 < 0.001 *** 0.001 0.003 ** 0.014 0.054

Significance after correction for false discovery rate:

*

q ≤ 0.05

**

q ≤ 0.01

***

q ≤ 0.001.