Table 2.
compd no. | structure | NK1Rb | NK1R | GPId | MVDd | MOPe | DOPe |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ki (nM) | pA2c | IC50 (nM) | IC50 (nM) | Ki (nM) | Ki (nM) | ||
1f | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NH2 | nd | nd | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.60 |
2g | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NH2 | nd | nd | 0.80 | 0.24 | 1.34 | 17.0 |
3f | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NMe-3′,5′-(CF3)2-Bn | 0.5 | 7.80 | 8.51 | 43.3 | 0.42 | 10.4 |
4g | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NMe-Bn | 13.0 | 6.44 | 1.86 | 2.16 | 0.08 | 0.28 |
5g | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NMe-Bn | 1530 | nd | 5.97 | 8.64 | 0.09 | 2.35 |
6 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NcPr-3′,5′-(CF3)2-Bn | 735 | 5.36 | 18 | 16 | 47 | 190 |
7 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NcPr-Bn | 520 | 5.20 | 19 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 66 |
8 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NcPr-Bn | 95 | 5.50 | 10 | 11.2 | 0.30 | 68 |
9 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-isoindoline | >10 000 | 0.25 | 5 | 2.1 | 0.20 | 16 |
10 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-isoindoline | 3495 | 3.16 | 7.3 | 8.0 | 0.06 | 81 |
11 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NMe-2′-OMe-Bn | 501 | 4.84 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 0.90 | 26 |
12 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-β-Ala-NMe-2′-methylenenaphthyl | 612 | 7.01 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 0.40 | 44 |
13 | H-Dmt-D-Arg-Aba-Gly-NMe-2′-methylenenaphthyl | 709 | 5.44 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 2.8 | 228 |
Results of the compounds selected for in vivo testing are shown in bold. nd: not determined.
Binding affinities of compounds for hNK1 receptors were determined by displacement of [3H]substance P from binding sites in hNK1 receptors expressed in CHO cells.
The pA2 values were calculated using Schild’s equation.22
The GPI functional assay is representative of MOP receptor activation, whereas the MVD is a DOP receptor-representative assay.
Binding affinities of compounds for MOP and DOP receptors were determined by displacement of [3H]DAMGO ([D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin) and [3H]DSLET ([D-Ser2,Leu5]enkephalin-Thr6), respectively, from rat brain membrane binding sites.
Data from Ballet et al.1
Data from Guillemyn et al.2