Table 3.
The effort to cloak different users' characteristics using a logistic regression with 100 singular-value decomposition components, a logistic regression, and Naive Bayes model
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Task | LRSVD | LR | NB | LRSVD, % | LR, % | NB, % |
Age ![]() |
10.3 | 7.3 | 37.7 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 17.9 |
Agreeableness ![]() |
5.0 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 4.3 | 12.6 |
Conscientiousness ![]() |
4.7 | 3.4 | 16.1 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 44.1 |
Extraversion ![]() |
4.4 | 3.6 | 58.0 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 10.2 |
IQ ![]() |
6.9 | 3.7 | 21.6 | 4.5 | 7.3 | 7.2 |
IQ ![]() |
6.6 | 2.9 | 14.4 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 9.4 |
Is democrat | 8.5 | 9.4 | 61.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 10.6 |
Is drinking | 6.8 | 5.4 | 17.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 8.2 |
Is female | 10.0 | 11.6 | 377.4 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 25.9 |
Is gay | 5.7 | 9.1 | 20.6 | 3.8 | 15.0 | 15.3 |
Is homosexual | 3.5 | 3.4 | 8.2 | 2.4 | 3.9 | 10.8 |
Is lesbian | 3.1 | 2.5 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 13.6 |
Is Muslim | 11.7 | 8.9 | 31.1 | 9.6 | 10.1 | 46.5 |
Is single | 13.7 | 10.2 | 105.8 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 12.5 |
Is smoking | 8.4 | 7.0 | 26.2 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 13.5 |
Life satisfaction ![]() |
5.1 | 4.1 | 10.3 | 2.2 | 7.2 | 8.3 |
Network density ![]() |
10.5 | 2.6 | 75.7 | 2.1 | 3.9 | 7.7 |
Neuroticism ![]() |
9.1 | 2.3 | 254.5 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 18.0 |
Num friends ![]() |
5.0 | 4.7 | 52.6 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 10.6 |
Openness ![]() |
6.7 | 3.7 | 28.6 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 11.1 |
ss belief = 1 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 24.2 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 10.4 |
ss belief = 5 | 8.3 | 4.7 | 18.4 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 6.2 |
Uses drugs | 12.2 | 8.2 | 31.5 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 9.0 |
Mean | 7.5 | 5.5 | 56.8 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 14.8 |
Median | 6.8 | 4.6 | 26.2 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 10.8 |
Absolute efforts are presented in the left panel, and relative efforts are in the right panel.
LR, logistic regression; LRSVD, logistic regression singular-value decomposition; NB, Naive Bayes model.