Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;38(9):1062–1069. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.115

TABLE 3.

ATP, Culture Results, a and Acceptance Rates Obtained From Endoscope Samples Using 2 Different Sampling Techniques

No. of Endoscopes ATP (RLU) (95% CI) Culture (CFU) (95% CI) Indicator MO Acceptance Rate
100PHYS Gastroscopes 10 13 (2–23) 8 (0–17) 1/10 8/10
ERCP/Echo-endoscopes 10 17 (1–33) 6 (0–13) 1/10 8/10
Coloscopes 10 3 (0–8) 51 (0–164) 0/10 9/10
Bronchoscopes 10 1 (0–1) 3 (1–5) 1/10 b 8/10
All endoscopes 40 8 (4–13) 17 (0–42) c 3/40 (7.5%) 33/40 (82.5%) d
100PHYS+PT Gastroscopes 10 36 (14–58) 42 (18–69) 0/10 4/10
ERCP/Echo-endoscopes 10 36 (0–76) 53 (5–100) 1/10 5/10
Coloscopes 10 7 (0–19) 72 (0–158) 1/10 5/10
Bronchoscopes 10 1 (0–1) 4 (1–6) 0/10 10/10
All endoscopes 40 20 (8–31) 43 (19–66) c 2/40 (5%) 24/40 (60%) d

NOTE. 100PHYS, flushing with 100 mL sterile physiological saline; 100PHYS+PT, flush-brush-flush using 100 mL sterile physiological saline and a PULL THRU brush; RLUs relative light units; CFU, colony-forming units; MO, microorganisms; CI, confidence interval.

a

Culture results were obtained from TSA agars with filter.

b

In 1/10 bronchoscopes Aspergillus fumigatus was found.

c

Statistically significant difference between mean culture yield using 100PHYS and 100PHYS+PT sampling (P<.001).

d

Statistically significant difference between the number of samples classified as (un)acceptable using 100PHYS vs 100PHYS+PT (P=.03).