Table 2.
Review of studies of the antiglide plate fixation since 1990 with focusing on complications and functional results at one year.
| Study (antiglide plate) | No of patients |
Wound dehiscence |
Wound infection |
Hardware irritation Discomfort |
Peroneal tendinopathy/lesions* |
Loss of fixation |
Nerve problems |
Functional results at 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | ||||||||
| Winkler et al.6 | 93 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 2 (2.2) | Scale of Weber |
| 66.7% excellent results | ||||||||
| 27.9% good results | ||||||||
| 5.4% poor results | ||||||||
| Wissing et al.7 | 48 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | – | – |
| Treadwell and Fallat8 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.9) | lag screw | 0 | – |
| Ostrum9 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (12.5) | 0 | – | Questionnaire |
| 62% very satisfied | ||||||||
| 33% moderately satisfied | ||||||||
| 5% dissatisfied | ||||||||
| Lamontagne et al.14 | 85 | 1 (1.2) | 6 (7.1) | – | 0 | plate | – | Olerud and Molander scoring system mean ankle score 91% |
| Velez et al.15 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 2 (9.1) | – | – | – | Scale of Weber |
| 13.63% excellent results | ||||||||
| 81.81% good results | ||||||||
| 4.5% poor results | ||||||||
| Weber and Krause13 | 70 | – | – | 30 (42.8) | 9 (30.0)* | – | – | – |
| Shin et al.10 | 22 | – | 0 | 0 | 2 (9.1) | 0 | – | AOFAS score |
| 80 | ||||||||
| Ha et al.12 | 49 | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | Ankle scoring system |
| mean ankle score 94% | ||||||||
| Ahn et al.17 | 70 | – | – | 2 (2.9) | 3 (4.3) | screw | 2 (2.9) | AOFAS score |
| 90.8 (55–100) | ||||||||