Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;6(4):2516–2521. doi: 10.1039/c4sc03985h

Table 1. Summary of porosity parameters and comparison of R22 sorption performance for 1–3 .

Species d a a 2] Cavity [Å3] Void [%] V c b [cm3 g–1] S BET c [m2 g–1] m 273 d [g g–1] m 313 d [g g–1] Δm e [g g–1] D s [cm2 s–1]
1 6.6 × 5.8 9.4 × 9.9 × 13.2 63.4 0.798 2032 0.91 0.74 0.46 (0.13 bar) 5.6 × 10–7
2 3.0 × 5.8 9.4 × 9.9 × 13.2 60.7 0.723 1787 0.82 0.66 0.41 (0.11 bar) 5.1 × 10–7
3 6.6 × 10.0 9.4 × 9.9 × 15.9 69.5 1.071 2742 1.17 0.73 0.72 (0.52 bar) 7.3 × 10–7

aThe apertures sizes along the a-axis.

bThe pore volumes estimated from crystal structures.

cMeasured BET surface areas.

d m 273 and m 313: R22 uptakes at 273 and 313 K, 1 bar, respectively.

eΔm: the highest working capacities between 273 and 313 K (at corresponding working pressures).