Table 3. Bivariate analysis of geographic risk factors (n = 1,086 individuals).
Exposure variable | n | Frequency of tungiasis | Presence of tungiasis | Presence of severe Tungiasis (> 30 lesions) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) any | (%) heavy | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |||
Location | ||||||||
Malanga Sublocationa | Mtoroni | 116 | 7.8 | 0.9 | Reference | |||
Yembe | 27 | 59.3 | 3.7 | 17.29 (6.20–48.23) | <0.0001 | 4.42 (0.27–73.05) | 0.2987 | |
Kadzitsoni | 133 | 33.8 | 3.8 | 6.08 (2.82–13.12) | <0.0001 | 4.49 (0.52–30.02) | 0.1732 | |
Chembe | 76 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 1.40 (0.51–3.80) | 0.5106 | 0.50 (0.02–12.52) | 0.6754 | |
Bahati | 17 | 64.7 | 0.0 | 21.80 (6.53–72.74) | <0.0001 | 2.20 (0.09–56.17) | 0.6334 | |
Kakuyuni Sublocation | Kakuyuni | 324 | 35.5 | 7.4 | 6.54 (3.19–13.40) | <0.0001 | 9.20 (1.23–68.80) | 0.0306 |
Goshi | 221 | 19.9 | 2.7 | 2.96 (1.39–6.30) | 0.0050 | 3.21 (0.38–26.98) | 0.2831 | |
Vihingoni | 172 | 13.4 | 2.3 | 1.84 (0.82–4.12) | 0.1416 | 2.74 (0.30–24.81) | 0.3704 |
a The village with the lowest prevalence was used as reference.