Skip to main content
. 2017;18(7):1751–1763. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.7.1751

Table 1.

Barriers to CCa Screening Based on Level of Income of the Countries

Author, Country and Year Study design and Methodology Sampling technique and frame Sample size (n) Age group (yrs.) Screening method used Barriers themes Quality rating*
Low income countries
Quantitative studies
Audet CM et al. Quantitative Convenience 101 30-56 VIA A Medium
Mozambique, 2012 Questionnaire survey In two clinics B
Cunningham MS et al. Quantitative Multistage cluster random 575 18-55 VIA A
B
D
E
High
Tanzania, 2015 Questionnaire survey In two districts
Mupepi SC et al. Quantitative Random 514 Dec-84 VIAC A High
Zimbabwe, 2011 Questionnaire survey In a rural district D
Perng P et al. Quantitative Convenience 300 25+ VIA A High
Tanzania, 2013 Questionnaire survey In a rural village B
D
Qualitative studies
Fort VK et al. Qualitative Convenience 20 20-50 VIA A
D
E
High
Malawi, 2011 In-depth interview In one hospital and catchment area
Ports KA et al. Qualitative Unclear 30 18-49 VIA D Medium
Malawi, 2015 In-depth interview In four villages
Lower-middle income countries
Quantitative studies
Quantitative Random 469 25-65 VIA A High
Basu P et al. Questionnaire survey In one area D
India, 2006
Islam RM et al. Quantitative Multistage cluster random 1590 30-59 VIA A High
Bangladesh, 2015 Questinnaire survey Nationally représentative B
Montgomery MP et al. Quantitative Convenience 202 18-44 Pap smear A
D
F
Low
India, 2015 Questinnaire survey In one hospital
Quantitative Systematic random 388 15-49 Pap smear A Medium
Sudenga SL et al Questionnaire survey In 4 health facilities in under one district B
Kenya, 2013 D
Qualitative studies
Ansink AC et al. Qualitative Convenience 220 20-49 VIA A Medium
Bangladesh, 2008 Focus group In catchment areas of 2 hospitals Men, women and Adolescents D
Garrett JJ et al. Qualitative Convenience 20 18-65 Pap smear A
C
D
E
High
Honduras, 2013 Focus group & in-depth interviews In rural settings
Kim YM et al. Qualitative Convenience 20 received VIA 25-50 Cryotherapy after VIA A High
Indonesia, 2012 Focus group In 7 health centres
Ngugi CW et al. Qualitative Convenience 50 18+ VIA/VILLI A
C
D
Medium
Kenya, 2012 In-depth interviews In one district hospital
Upper middle income countries
Quantitative studies
Augusto EF et al. Quantitative Unclear 351 17-79 Pap smear B Medium
Brazil, 2013 Questinnaire survey D
Budkaew J at al. Quantitative Systematic 195 30-60 Pap smear A
B
D
Medium
Thailand, 2014 Questionnaire survey & in-depth interviews In one medical hospital
Gan DEH et al. Quantitative Multistage random 959 20-64 Pap smear A
B
E
High
Malaysia, 2013 Questinnaire survey In 5 rural districts
Fernandes JV et al. Quantitative Stratified 267 15-69 Pap smear B
D
E
Low
Brazil, 2009 Questinnaire survey In a city
Jia Y et al. Quantitative Convenience 5929 26-65 VIA/VILLI/Colposcopy A
B
D
F
High
China, 2013 Questinnaire survey In 3 high incidence towns
Kangmennaang J et al. Quantitative Stratified random 6542 15-64 Pap smear A High
Namibia, 2015 Questinnaire survey Nationally representative D
Marvan M L et al. Quantitative Convenience 384 26-64 Pap smear A
B
D
Medium
Mexico, 2013 Questinnaire survey In one urban and 2 rural areas
Nwankwo KC et al. Quantitative Convenience 815 18-70 Pap smear A Medium
Nigeria, 2011 Questinnaire survey In a church-based mandatory annual meeting D
Reis N et al. Quantitative Random 387 Average age 34.4 years Pap smear A Medium
Turkey, 2012 Questinnaire survey In outpatient clinics of 2 cities B
D
F
Watkins MM et al. Quantitative Convenience 97 16-66 Pap smear A Medium
Mexico, 2002 Questinnaire survey In a rural village B
D
Agurto I et al. Combination of 5 Qualitative studies Convenience Unclear 25-64 Pap smear C Low
Latin America, 2004 Focus group and in-depth interviews In 6 areas in 5 countries D
Duran ET Qualitative Convenience 11 15-49 No specific CCa screening A Low
Turkey, 2011 Case studies In 2 hospitals in a small city C
D
Ersin F et al. Qualitative Random 35 40+ Pap smear A Low
Turkey, 2013 Focus group In one district B
D
Lazcano-ponce EC et al. Qualitative Convenience 4 FG 25-35 Pap smear A High
Mexico, 1999 Focus group One urban and one rural city (each 7/8) B
D
E
Markovic M et al. Qualitative Convenience 62 35-55 Pap smear A Medium
Serbia, 2005 Focus group In 2 cities C
D
E
McFarland D M Qualitative Convenience 30 30+ Pap smear A High
Botswana 2003 Questionnaire and In capital city D
semi-structured interview E
Paz-Soldan VA et al. Qualitative Convenience 177 18-40 Pap smear A Medium
Peru, 2010 Focus group In 4 cities C

Note: CCa, Cervical cancer; VIA, Visual inspection with acetic acid; VIAC, Visual inspection with acetic acid and camera; VILLI, Visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine, colposcopy; A, Barriers related to lack of knowledge and awareness about cervical cancer, and screening methods; B, Demographic factors include age, marital status, occupation; C, Psychological factors include fear, anxiety, depression etc.; D, structural barriers include education, income and cost associated with screening and treatment, distance to the service centres, access and availability to screening; E, Socio-cultural and religious barriers include that family does not allow screening, modesty mostly associated with religion, believing the disease caused by a curse; and F, Perceived barriers, particularly the health belief model.