Table 4.
Results of linkage disequilibrium analysis based on allelic profile data
| Population | n | H ± SD | I S A | PMC | VD | L | VD > L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 36 | 0.5151 ± 0.1396 | 0.0903 | 1.10 × 10−02 | 0.9725 | 0.7652 | Y |
| Alla | 23 | 0.6107 ± 0.1358 | 0.0408 | 2.11 × 10−01 | 0.8191 | 0.7297 | Y |
| Population 1 | 14 | 0.2637 ± 0.1539 | 0.0482 | 1.97 × 10−01 | 0.5636 | 0.4925 | Y |
| Population 2 | 10 | 0.2833 ± 0.1641 | -0.0358 | – | 0.4364 | 0.4889 | N |
| Population 3 | 12 | 0.6856 ± 0.0908 | 0.0739 | 1.76 × 10−01 | 0.9326 | 0.7633 | Y |
| Population 1a | 7 | 0.5833 ± 0.1463 | -0.0331 | 7.75 × 10−01 | 0.6443 | 0.7153 | N |
| Population 2a | 6 | 0.3167 ± 0.1873 | -0.0690 | – | 0.3524 | 0.4444 | N |
| Population 3a | 12 | 0.6856 ± 0.0908 | 0.0739 | 1.76 × 10−01 | 0.9326 | 0.7633 | Y |
aConsidering each group of isolates with the same MLG as one individual
Abbreviations: n number of isolates, H mean genetic diversity, SD standard deviation, I S A standardized index of association, P MC significance for obtaining this value in 1000 simulations using the Monte Carlo method, V D variance of pair-wise differences, L 95% critical value for VD, VD > L indicates linkage disequilibrium, Y, V D > L N, VD ≤ L