Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;10:501. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2482-0

Table 3.

Best-performing Generalized Additive Model (GAM) estimating EEEV presence/absence in Cs. melanura. All explanatory variables included in the model are listed in the left-most column, including the most important spatial scale or temporal lag for that variable. The proportion of the deviance explained by each explanatory variable is listed in the right-most column. The proportion of the total deviance explained by the full model is listed in the left-most column header. For the sixth variable listed, there were two time periods when hydrological conditions were important. The variable for the second important time-period and the output values that change between models are listed in brackets

Response: EEEV Pres/Abs (Deviance explained: 0.49 [0.46]) χ 2 P Deviance explained
Emergent Wetland 2000 m 8.2 [4.6] 0.01 [0.06]* 0.01
Evergreen Forested Wetland 1000 m 0 [1.4] 0.3 [0.1] 0
Deciduous Forested Wetland 5000 m 6.1 [15.6] 0.005 [< 0.001]* 0.03 [0.01]
Scrub/Shrub Wetland 5000 m 0 [0] 0.8 [1] 0
Average Forested Wetland Size 1500 m 2.1 [0.01] 0.08 [0.2] 0.01 [0.02]
Relative semi-permanent wetland 500 m* PHDI (10 lag) OR [Relative semi-permanent wetland 500 m* PHDI (0 lag)] 43.5 [24.7] < 0.001* 0.06
Impervious Surfaces 200 m 3.7 [3.9] 0.1 [0.1] 0.01
Month 50.1 [51.6] < 0.001* 0.17
Mean Cs. melanura abundance 70.9 [53.8] < 0.001* 0.15
% Gravid Traps (linear) -4.3 [−4.7] (z) < 0.001* 0.05

*P < 0.05