Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Jun 20;71(3):329–344. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2017.1334957

Appendix Table A1.

Logistic regression models of between-wave changes as predictors of wanting to stop childbearing at T2, separately by desire at T1 (parameter estimates and standard errors)

Do not want to stop Want to stop

b SE b SE

Intercept -3.53 0.26 *** −0.95 0.35 **
Changes in number of living children
Birth(s) between wavesa 1.25 0.14 *** 0.51 0.18 **
Child death(s) between waves −0.78 0.27 ** −0.10 0.49
Changes in marital status
Marital dissolution 1.27 0.20 *** 0.16 0.30
Remarriage 0.96 0.73 −1.22 0.58 *
Changes in household wealth
Improved household wealth scale −0.02 0.14 0.06 0.22
Worse household wealth scale −0.01 0.14 0.20 0.20
Gained cattle ownership −0.22 0.19 0.11 0.27
Lost cattle ownership 0.21 0.22 −0.01 0.37
Changes in husband’s migration
Became successful migrant −0.22 0.18 −0.33 0.28
Became unsuccessful migrant −0.05 0.19 −0.35 0.25
Returned migrant 0.03 0.15 −0.06 0.22
Changes in worry about HIV
More worried 0.06 0.17 −0.23 0.24
Less worried 0.05 0.12 0.01 0.17
Fixed controls
Age 25 and under −0.36 0.14 ** −0.43 0.23 +
Age 31 and over 0.24 0.15 0.67 0.19 ***
1–4 years of education 0.51 0.15 *** −0.24 0.21
5 or more years of education 0.61 0.16 *** −0.16 0.24
Number of living children at time 1b 0.53 0.05 *** 0.42 0.06 ***
Time
W1-W2 (vs W2-W3) 0.15 0.12 0.01 0.16

N 1885 1027
−2 LL 1952 1002
a

For women pregnant at time 2, includes pregnancy.

b

For women pregnant at time 1, includes pregnancy.

Women with non-missing data on predictors and outcome variables. Models pool changes between Waves 1 and 2 and between Waves 2 and 3; standard errors are adjusted to account for non-independence of women observed at both times.

+

: p<0.10;

*

: p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure