Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Apr;12(2):532–546. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9721-z

Table 1.

Significant ANCOVA interactions for between-group differences in FDG metabolic rates

ASD vs. schizophrenia vs. normal controls ASD vs. schizophrenia ASD vs. normal controls Schizophrenia vs. normal controls
Whole brain g×BA F82, 4797=2.20, p<0.0000001 (0.0005)* F41, 2583=1.57, p<0.01 (0.35) F41, 3157=2.23, p=0.00001 (0.005)* F41, 3813=2.60, p<0.0000001 (0.01)
Frontal lobe ME F2, 117=4.91, p=0.009 F1, 93=9.88, p=0.002*
g×BA F20, 1170=2.54, p=0.0002 (0.002)* F10, 930=5.38, p<0.0000001 (0.0036)*
Parietal lobe ME F2, 117=3.36, p=0.04 F1, 77=4.51, p=0.037
g×BA F14, 819=3.47, p=0.000002 (0.000005)* F7, 441=1.99, p=0.055 (0.09) F7, 539=3.43, p=0.001 (0.000009)* F7, 651=5.70, p=0.000002 (0.00015)*
Occipital lobe g×BA F4, 234=2.52, p=0.04 (0.05) F2, 186=3.90, p=0.02 (0.09)
Hippocampus ME F2, 117=9.71, p=0.0001* F1, 77=13.76, p=0.0004* F1, 93=18.22, p=0.00005*
Hypothalamus ME F2, 117=4.08, p=0.02 F1, 63=7.05, p=0.01 F1, 93=6.26, p=0.007
Mammilary bodies F1, 63=4.38, p=0.04
Thalamic nuclei
 Lateral posterior ME F2, 117=6.35, p=0.002* F1, 63=3.84, p=0.055 F1, 93=10.85, p=0.001*
 Ventral posteromedial ME F2, 117=2.59, p=0.08 F1, 93=5.10, p=0.026
 Ventral posterolateral ME F2, 117=4.34, p=0.015 F1, 93=7.93, p=0.006
 Pulvinar ME F2, 117=4.06, p=0.02 F1, 93=7.62, p=0.007
 Mediodorsal ME F2, 117=2.50, p=0.09 F1, 93=4.07, p=0.047
Caudate subdivisions g×R F4, 234=10.15, p<0.0000001 (0.000035)* F2, 154=6.41, p=0.002 (0.01) F2, 186=18.64, p<0.00000001 (0.000007)*
 Head of the caudate ME F2, 117=2.64, p=0.08 F1, 93=4.92, p=0.03
 Tail of the caudate ME F2, 117=10.87, p=0.00005* F1, 77=9.69, p=0.003* F1, 93=25.79, p=0.000002*
Putamen ME F2, 117=6.18, p=0.003* F1, 77=5.76, p=0.02 F1, 93=11.62, p=0.001*
Medial globus pallidus ME F2, 117=4.18, p=0.02 F1, 77=7.80, p=0.007
Lateral globus pallidus ME F2, 117=4.83, p=0.01 F1, 77=8.52, p=0.005 F1, 93=4.67, p=0.03
Claustrum ME F2, 117=10.36, p=0.00007* F1, 77=13.14, p=0.0005* F1, 93=16.86, p=0.00009*
Amygdala ME F2, 117=4.87, p=0.009 F1, 77=7.48, p=0.008 F1, 93=8.09, p=0.0055

For all higher-order ANCOVA interactions (i.e. other than the main effects) univariate p-values are followed by multivariate Wilks’ λ p-values in parentheses; p-values at trend level of significance (<0.1) are italicized. Abbreviations: ME – main effect of diagnostic group, g×R – group-by-region interaction, g×BA – group-by-Brodmann area interaction.

MANOVA interactions that met the Bonferroni correction are indicated by asterisks. The frontal and parietal lobe group×Brodmann area interactions met the Bonferroni criteria for four brain lobes and two hemispheres (0.05/8=0.00625). We chose all ANOVAs (three diagnostic groups and the 3 paired comparisons by four lobes, 4 x 4=16) as a divisor, but note that this correction could be considered to be spuriously failing to replicate published findings in schizophrenia and autism literature. For the 16 subcortical regions, at the p<0.05 level the three-group main effect was significant for 15 out of 16 tests, the main effect of group for healthy controls vs. schizophrenia comparisons was significant in 14 out of 16 tests, and the main effect of group for healthy controls vs ASD comparisons was significant in 9 out of 16 tests. The Bonferroni correction criterion for 16 subcortical regions was 0.00315 (0.05/16).