Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;55(9):2609–2616. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-17

TABLE 3.

Performance characteristics of colistin and polymyxin B susceptibility testing methods in comparison to broth microdilutiona

Drug Method No. of isolates that were susceptible No. of isolates that were resistant No. (%) of isolates exhibiting EA No. (%) of isolates exhibiting CA No. of isolates exhibiting VMEs (%) No. of isolates exhibiting MEs (%) Spearman's coefficient
Colistin Vitek 2 60 16 71 (93.4)b 67 (88.2) 9 (36.0) 0 (0) 0.873c
Sensititre 46 30 68 (89.5) 69 (90.1)b 1 (4) 6 (11.8) 0.863c
Etest 51 25 57 (75.0) 70 (92.1)b 3 (12.0) 3 (5.9) 0.600c
MicroScan 44 32 NAd 67 (88.2) 1 (4) 8 (15.8) NAd
Polymyxin B BMD 49 27 NA NA NA NA NA
Vitek 2 47 29 73 (96.1)b 72 (94.7)b 1 (3.7) 3 (6.1) 0.917c
Sensititre 47 29 73 (96.1)b 72 (94.7)b 1 (3.7) 3 (6.1) 0.877c
Etest 53 23 38 (48.7) 68 (89.5) 6 (26.1) 1 (1.9) 0.534c
a

BMD, broth microdilution; EA, essential agreement; CA, categorical agreement; VME, very major error; ME, major error; NA, not applicable. Spearman's coefficient indicates concordance of MICs with those of BMD.

b

The testing method-drug combination meets CLSI M52 recommendations for acceptable EA or CA performance.

c

P value < 0.001.

d

EA and Spearman's correlation coefficient were not determined for MicroScan due to a narrow MIC range.