Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;12(4):224–229. doi: 10.1159/000475745

Table 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of all patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer (cT2) versus inflammatory breast cancer (cT4d)

cT4d, n (%) cT2, n (%)
Number of MRIs
 2 6 (40.0) 3 (25.0)
 3 9 (60.0) 9 (75.0)
Skin thickening
 None 1 (6.7) 8 (66.7)
 Focal 2 (13.3) 2 (16.7)
 Diffuse 12 (80.0) 2 (16.7)
Skin enhancement
 None 1 (6.7) 9 (75.0)
 Focal 3 (20.0) 1 (8.3)
 Regional 4 (26.7) 2 (16.7)
 Diffuse 7 (46.7) 0 (0.0)
Pectoral muscle invasion 2 (13.3) 1 (8.3)
Axillary lymphadenopathy
 Normal 10 (66.7) 9 (75.0)
 Enlarged 1 (6.7) 3 (25.0)
 Pathological aspects 4 (26.7) 0 (0.0)
Enhancement pattern
 Non-mass enhancement (NME) 10 (66.7) 1 (8.3)
 Mass 3 (20.0) 11 (91.6)
 NME+Mass 2 (13.3) 0 (8.3)
NME distribution
 Focal 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Segmental 2 (13.3) 1 (8.3)
 Regional 3 (20.0) 0 (0.0)
 Diffuse 7 (46.7) 0 (0.0)
NME internal enhancement pattern
 Homogenous 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Heterogeneous 11 (73.4) 1 (8.3)
 Clumped 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
Clustered ring 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Mass margins
 Sharp 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Indistinct 0 (0.0) 5 (41.6)
 Spiculated 5 (33.3) 6 (50.0)
Pathological complete response (pCR) 3 (20.0) 5 (41.6)
Radiological complete response (rCR) 2 (13.3) 3 (25.0)
rCR and pCR concordant 2 (66.7) 2 (40.0)