Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan;42(1):109–121. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9343-1

Table 2.

Measures at Baseline and Follow-up Interviews

PS Mean (sd) Usual Care Mean (sd) Differences at Baseline1 Statistical results from mixed model analyses2
Measures Total (n=122) Total (n=116) t-test, p value Interaction Treatment Pre-post
Measures available at all sites
Mental Health Recovery Measure
 Baseline 85.00 (17.88) 78.30 (18.79) 2.59, 0.01 −0.58, 0.56 0.36, 0.72 0.55, 0.58
 Post 85.66 (15.90) 80.52 (16.54)
 Change 0.52 2.40
Illness Management and Recovery Scale
 Baseline 3.51 (.58) 3.39 (.56) 1.63, 0.10 −0.16, 0.87 0.38, 0.70 0.71, 0.48
 Post 3.56 (.56) 3.48 (.54)
 Change 0.06 0.083
BASIS-R Total score
 Baseline 26.15 (14.28) 29.34 (14.24) 2.38, 0.02 0.67, 0.50 −0.99, 0.32 2.40, 0.016
 Post 24.57 (14.05) 26.76 (15.11)
 Change −1.54 −2.723
BASIS–R, Interpersonal Relationships scale
 Baseline 1.67 (.92) 1.63 (.87) 0.36, 0.72 −0.89. 0.38 0.21, 0.84 −1.00, 0.32
 Post 1.48 (.85) 1.54 (.96)
 Change −.173 −.103
BASIS-R, Depression scale
 Baseline 1.28 (.89) 1.55 (.88) 2.37, 0.02 1.34. 0.18 −1.24, 0.22 2.05, 0.04
 Post 1.27 (.91) 1.41 (.92)
 Change −.01 −.143
BASIS-R, Psychosis scale
 Baseline 1.03 (.95) 1.15 (.91) −0.96, 0.34 0.28, 0.52 −0.76, 0.45 −0.76, 0.45
 Post 1.01 (.99) 1.09 (.97)
 Change −.03 −.08
Patient Activation Measure4
 Baseline 39.31 (5.41) 39.09 (5.37) 0.49, 0.63 2.00, 0.05 1.98, 0.05 −1.32, 0.19
 Post 40.34 (5.50) 38.76 (5.01)
 Change 0.85 −0.24
Recovery Self-Assessment4
 Baseline 3.86 (.53) 3.81 (.61) 0.66, 0.51 0.56, 0.58 −0.89, .38 −0.14, 0.89
 Post 3.93 (.61) 3.83 (.52)
 Change 0.04 0.01
Quality of Life-Brief, Subjective overall quality of life4
 Baseline 4.64 (1.04) 4.54 (1.03) 1.27, 0.21 0.03, 0.98 2.76, 0.006 1.01, 0.31
 Post 4.72 (1.04) 4.71 (.90)
 Change −0.08 0.203
1

Independent group t-tests comparing participants in the PS and Usual Care groups at baseline.

2

Z-tests of whether the regression co-efficient for effects are significantly different from 0, which included demographic variables, site of care and BASIS-R total score as covariates.

3

This change is significantly different from 0, indicating that there was a change in means over time within this treatment condition. This test does not compare the change between groups, only the change in the group identified.

4

PS group n=66

*

Analyses of the BASIS-R total and subscale did not include the BASIS-R total score as a covariate.