Table 5. Study assessments—qualitative studies.
Authors (year) | Aims clearly stated? | Qualitative method appropriate? | Design appropriate to address aims? | Recruitment strategy appropriate? | Data collected so as to address research issue? | Relationship between researcher & participants adequately considered? | Ethical issues considered? | Data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | Findings clearly stated? | Overall quality rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adams, Shakespeare-Finch & Armstrong (2015) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Strong |
Coxon et al. (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Strong |
Forslund, Kihlgren & Kihlgren (2004) | Yes | Yes | Can’t Tell | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Weak |
Gallagher & McGilloway (2008) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Yes | No | Can’t tell | No | Yes | Moderate |
Palmer (2014) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Can’t Tell | Yes | Moderate |
Shuler & Sypher (2000) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Yes | No | Can’t tell | Yes | Yes | Moderate |
Tracy & Tracy (1998) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | Yes | Yes | Moderate |