Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 13;23(18):5426–5436. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0906

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of HSI, autofluorescence imaging, 2-NBDG fluorescence imaging, and proflavine fluorescence imaging using the intra-patient classification method

Cancer site Imaging method AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
Oral cavity (n = 12) HSI 0.95 ± 0.05 89% ± 8% 90% ± 7% 90% ± 8%
Autofluorescence 0.82 ± 0.20 81% ± 16% 80% ± 16% 80% ± 19%
2-NBDG 0.83 ± 0.14 79% ± 14% 79% ± 15% 79% ± 14%
Proflavine 0.68 ± 0.18 66% ± 14% 64% ± 16% 69% ± 15%
Gland (6 thyroid, 1 parotid) HSI 0.96 ± 0.04 91% ± 7% 91% ± 8% 93% ± 6%
Autofluorescence 0.72 ± 0.31 67% ± 33% 80% ± 20% 71% ± 35%
2-NBDG 0.84 ± 0.18 80% ± 17% 78% ± 19% 82% ± 16%
Proflavine 0.80 ± 0.23 78% ± 21% 73% ± 26% 82% ± 15%
Larynx and pharynx (n = 3) HSI 0.97 ± 0.03 94% ± 4% 95% ± 4% 90% ± 7%
Autofluorescence 0.74 ± 0.26 74% ± 21% 74% ± 28% 79% ± 22%
2-NBDG 0.97 ± 0.04 92% ± 7% 92% ± 8% 92% ± 5%
Proflavine 0.79 ± 0.23 77% ± 20% 77% ± 20% 74% ± 23%
Paranasal and nasal (n = 3) HSI 0.96 ± 0.02 90% ± 5% 90% ± 5% 90% ± 4%
Autofluorescence 0.81 ± 0.11 76% ± 10% 79% ± 8% 72% ± 14%
2-NBDG 0.76 ± 0.18 68% ± 19% 64% ± 20% 79% ± 7%
Proflavine 0.80 ± 0.08 73% ± 6% 69% ± 11% 79% ± 2%