Skip to main content
. 2010 May 19;1(3):118–128. doi: 10.4021/wjon2010.06.213w

Table 6. Correlation Between ER and PR Status With Clinico-pathological Data.

N ER Expression
PR Expression
% p1 Score ± SD p2 % p1 Score ± SD p2
Age (years) 0.296 0.614 0.707 0.537
≤ 55 31 29 1.06 ± 2.30 35.5 1.87 ± 3.05
>55 26 42.3 1.38 ± 2.45 30.8 1.38 ± 2.80
FIGO Stage 0.568 0.105 0.170 0.045
I-II 20 40 1.90 ± 3.38 45 2.70 ± 3.68
III-IV 37 32.4 0.84 ± 1.48 27 1.08 ± 2.27
Residual disease 0.945 0.289 0.039 0.013
None/Optimal 31 35.5 1.52 ± 2.89 45.2 2.52 ± 3.45
Sub-optimal 26 34.6 0.85 ± 1.46 19.2 0.62 ± 1.67
Histologic type 0.813 0.570 0.088 0.010
Serous 24 33.3 1.00 ± 1.64 20.8 0.50 ± 1.06
No Serous 33 36.4 1.36 ± 2.78 42.4 2.48 ± 3.52
Histologic Grade 0.021 0.021 0.036 0.036
I-II 34 47.1 1.47 ± 0.50 44.1 1.44 ± 0.50
III 23 17.4 1.17 ± 0.38 17.4 1.17 ± 0.38
Ascites 0.599 0.986 0.84 0.933
<100 ml 23 39.1 1.22 ± 1.70 34.8 1.61 ± 2.72
>100 ml 34 32.4 1.21 ± 2.73 32.4 1.68 ± 3.09
Cytology 0.70 0.90 0.134 0.182
Negative 28 71.4 1.75 ± 3.02 42.9 2.18 ± 3.19
Positive 29 75.9 0.69 ± 1.31 24.1 1.14 ± 2.58

p1: Chi-Square test; p2: Student test; %: positivity percentage; ER: Estrogen receptor; PR: Progesterone receptor; SD: standard deviation.