Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):834–844. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201612-2438OC

Table 2.

Supine Lung Function

  Room Air
80% Oxygen
Two-Way RM ANOVA
  Baseline Methacholine Baseline Methacholine Room Air vs. 80% Oxygen Baseline vs. Methacholine Interaction
FEV1, % predicted, % decrease from baseline 83.3 ± 5.0 66.3 ± 4.7*, 18.9 ± 16.6% 83.4 ± 5.2 66.8 ± 5.5*, 19.3 ± 15.4% n.s. P < 0.05 n.s.
FVC, % predicted, % decrease from baseline 90.1 ± 5.0 82.4 ± 5.9, 8.5 ± 14.5% 91.4 ± 4.9 82.6 ± 5.4, 7.9 ± 15.4% n.s. n.s. n.s.
FEV1/FVC, % 78.1 ± 3.1 68.4 ± 3.8 77.0 ± 3.6 68.3 ± 3.8 n.s. P < 0.01 n.s.
Oxygen saturation, % 99.4 ± 1.0 98.5 ± 1.4 99.7 ± 1.0 99.7 ± 0.5 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Heart rate, bpm 64.5 ± 6.0 72.1 ± 16.1 64.3 ± 10.9 66.6 ± 10.7 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Blood pressure, systolic/diastolic, mm Hg 102/56 ± 9/10 109/63* ± 5/10 107/61 ± 13/14 108/60 ± 11/11 n.s. Diastolic: P < 0.05 n.s.
Mean lung volume, L 3.2 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.1 n.s. P < 0.05 n.s.

Definition of abbreviations: bpm = beats per minute; n.s. = not significant; RM ANOVA = repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Percentage predicted values were calculated on the basis of publication by Hankinson and colleagues (54).

*

P < 0.01 significant difference between baseline and after methacholine using post hoc analysis.

P < 0.001 significant difference between baseline and after methacholine using post hoc analysis.