Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 14;8(43):74595–74606. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20245

Table 1. Meta-analysis of four independent SNPs in MDACC and Harvard databases.

SNP Allelea Gene MDACC (n=858)b Harvard (n=409)c Meta-analysisd
HR (95%CI) P HR (95%CI) P Phet I2(%) HR (95%CI) P
rs6707820 C>T NCK2 2.19 (1.48-3.25) 9.53E-05 1.34 (0.76-2.37) 0.310 0.164 48.4 1.87 (1.35-2.59) 1.53E-05
rs2306574 T>C PRKCD 1.92 (1.40-2.64) 6.46E-05 1.31 (0.86-2.19) 0.181 0.242 27.1 1.73 (1.33-2.24) 4.56E-06
rs2645768 A>C COL6A3 1.91 (1.41-2.58) 2.40E-05 0.65 (0.37-1.14) 0.131 0.001 90.9 1.14 (0.40-3.29) 0.801
rs13301426 C>T COL5A1 2.36 (1.53-3.64) 9.54E-05 1.05 (0.52-2.14) 0.903 0.056 72.7 1.66 (0.75-3.64) 0.210

MDACC: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; HR: hazards ratio; CI: confidence interval; Phet: P-value for heterogeneity test, SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.

aReference allele/effect allele.

bAdjusted for age, sex, Breslow’s tumor thickness, regional/distant metastasis, ulceration and mitotic rate.

cAdjusted for age and sex.

dIf Phet <0.10 or I2>50%, random-effects model was selected; otherwise fixed-effect model was selected.