Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;8(43):75597–75606. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17491

Table 1. Correlation between parameters and the different pathologic scoring systems.

pCR* TRG0-1* TNM-downstaging*
Pathologic evaluation Non-pCR(n=42) vs. pCR(n=14) p TRG2-3(n=34) vs.TRG0-1(n=22) p No(n=30) vs. Yes(n=26) p
ADCpre(×10-3mm2/s) 0.86±0.15 vs. 0.82±0.11 0.332 0.86±0.17 vs. 0.83±0.11 0.524 0.85±0.13 vs. 0.85±0.17 0.944
ADCpost(×10-3mm2/s) 1.12±0.16 vs. 1.31±0.13 <0.001 1.10±0.15 vs. 1.27±0.17 <0.001 1.10±0.15 vs. 1.25±0.17 0.001
ADCratio 0.33±0.27 vs. 0.64±0.34 <0.001 0.32±0.26 vs. 0.55±0.34 0.006 0.32±0.24 vs. 0.52±0.35 0.015
MDpre(×10-3mm2/s) 1.50±0.33 vs. 1.40±0.21 0.269 1.51±0.35 vs. 1.43±0.21 0.314 1.49±0.27 vs. 1.46±0.34 0.763
MDpost(×10-3mm2/s) 1.95±0.30 vs. 2.45±0.33 <0.001 1.98±0.32vs. 2.23±0.42 0.012 1.94±0.29 vs. 2.23±0.41 0.003
MDratio 0.35±0.32 vs. 0.80±0.43 <0.001 0.36±0.32 vs. 0.62±0.46 0.017 0.35±0.31 vs. 0.59±0.45 0.017
MKpre 0.89±0.11 vs. 0.72±0.09 <0.001 0.90±0.11 vs. 0.77±0.11 <0.001 0.86±0.10 vs. 0.82±0.14 0.075
MKpost 0.68±0.08 vs. 0.56±0.06 <0.001 0.69±0.07 vs. 0.59±0.08 <0.001 0.67±0.08 vs. 0.63±0.10 0.167
MKratio 0.23±0.01 vs. 0.21±0.13 0.678 0.22±0.11 vs. 0.23±0.11 0.733 0.23±0.10 vs. 0.21±0.12 0.513

*Data are the means±standard deviation.

MKratio=(MKpre-MKpost)/MKpre; MDratio=( MDpost-MDpre)/MDpre;

ADCratio=(ADCpost-ADCpre)/ADCpre