Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Opt Lett. 2016 Nov 15;41(22):5230–5233. doi: 10.1364/OL.41.005230

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Image of μax(r) and η(r) parameters reconstructed from calibrated data collected from the printed mouse phantom with an EGFP inhomogeneity: (a) μa(r) cross section at the peak reconstructed value (z = 9 mm plane); (b) μa(r) isosurface; (c) η(r) cross section at the peak reconstructed value (z = 12 mm plane); and (d) η(r) isosurface. Black circles show the target inhomogeneity.