Table 4.
Results of key sensitivity analysesa
| Model A | Model B | Model C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Latino Whiteb | Non-Latino Black c | Year fixed effects d | |
|
| |||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Time (centered at 21) | 1.00 (0.99 – 1.01) | 1.02 (1.00 – 1.04)* | |
| Time squared | 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00) | 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00) | |
| Year fixed effects | |||
| 2005 | ref. | ||
| 2006 | 0.85 (0.67 – 1.08) | ||
| 2007 | 0.70 (0.47 – 1.04) | ||
| 2008 | 0.52 (0.29 – 0.91)* | ||
| 2009 | 0.61 (0.33 – 1.11) | ||
| 2010 | 0.73 (0.39 – 1.38) | ||
| 2011 | 0.71 (0.37 – 1.36) | ||
| 2012 | 0.79 (0.39 – 1.60) | ||
| 2013 | 0.75 (0.33 – 1.69) | ||
| 2014 | 0.77 (0.33 – 1.80) | ||
| Noncitizen parent(s) | 1.55 (1.43 – 1.69)*** | ||
| Effects for children with only noncitizen parents: e | |||
| first omnibus law passage | 0.85 (0.48 – 1.49) | ||
| first law, post-passage year fixed effects | |||
| post-passage year 1 | 0.96 (0.37 – 2.47) | ||
| post-passage year 2 | 1.00 (0.54 – 1.86) | ||
| post-passage year 3 | 5.14 (1.85 – 14.30)** | ||
| post-passage year 4 | 1.34 (0.61 – 2.94) | ||
| post-passage year 5 | 0.62 (0.18 – 2.17) | ||
| post-passage year 6 | 2.14 (0.74 – 6.19) | ||
| post-passage year 7 | 1.75 (0.50 – 6.09) | ||
| post-passage year 8 | 2.56 (0.53 – 12.45) | ||
| Effects for children with at least one citizen parent: | |||
| first omnibus law passage | 1.50 (0.98 – 2.31) | ||
| first law, post-passage trend fixed effects | |||
| post-passage year 1 | 1.08 (0.57 – 2.03) | ||
| post-passage year 2 | 0.45 (0.24 – 0.82)* | ||
| post-passage year 3 | 0.76 (0.27 – 2.11) | ||
| post-passage year 4 | 0.89 (0.40 – 1.95) | ||
| post-passage year 5 | 0.86 (0.32 – 2.27) | ||
| post-passage year 6 | 0.62 (0.21 – 1.78) | ||
| post-passage year 7 | 0.74 (0.38 – 1.45) | ||
| post-passage year 8 | 0.63 (0.23 – 1.70) | ||
| Effects for non-Latino White or Black children: | |||
| first omnibus law passage | 0.80 (0.56 – 1.14) | 0.93 (0.63 – 1.37) | |
| first law, post-passage trend | 1.09 (0.99 – 1.19) | 0.89 (0.78 – 1.02) | |
| first law, post-passage trend squared | 0.99 (0.99 – 1.00) | 1.01 (1.00 – 1.02) | |
| first law, post-passage trend cubed | 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00) | 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00) | |
|
| |||
| Unweighted sample size | n=102,765 | n=37,761 | n=70,187 |
| F-test | F(99, 601.7)=103.12*** | F(100, 460.6)=524.66*** | F(137, 584.0)=84.36*** |
a
Models include all covariates described in the methods section.
b
The sample for Model A includes all White children in NHIS, age 0–17, who were US citizens and had US-citizen parents.
c
The sample for Model B includes all Black children in NHIS, age 0–17, who were US citizens and had US-citizen parents.
d
Model C uses year, rather than quarter-year, as the time unit for existing time trends and for post-passage trends. These are treated as a series of dummy variables (fixed effects).
e
Coefficients on policy variables for children of noncitizen parents were calculated from interaction terms using multiple imputation nlcom commands.
OR=Odds Ratio, CI = Confidence Interval,
*
p<.05,
**
p<.01,
***
p<.001