Table 2.

Descriptors used in Table 1 for the characterisation of the included studies.

Category	Attribute	Explanation	Example
Publication	Year	Year of publication	1999
	Author(s)	Authors of the publication (abbreviated in cases of more than 2 authors)	Ripoll
Task	Sport	Researched kind of sport	Basketball
	N	Number of participants for whom gaze behavior was analyzed divided by total number of participants	20/20
	Condition	Visualization conditions: lab (slides or videos) vs. field (in-situ investigations)	Lab+field
	View	Viewing perspective: 1st (agent's perspective) vs. 3rd (agent presented on the field) vs. bird (from above)	1st
	Response	Required motor response: natural (natural action) vs. artificial (verbal, button press, joystick, no response)	Natural
Gaze analysis	Trials	Number of trials in which the gaze behavior was analyzed divided by the total number of trials	22/26
	ET	Eye tracker; type: m (mobile) vs. s (stationary); and sampling rate (in Hz)	m/25
	GCA	Gaze-cue allocation: manual (ratings) vs. algo. (algorithmic)	Manual
	NAOI	Number of pre-defined areas of interest gaze could be allocated to (alternatively: heat map illustration)	5
Gaze measures	FD	Fixation durations; x (measured, e.g., as mean fixation duration) vs. – (not measured)	x
	NF	Number of fixations: x (measured, e.g., as average count over a single trial) vs. – (not measured)	–
	SA	Saccades: x (measured; e.g., as average count over a single trial) vs. – (not measured)	x
	VT	Viewing times: x (analyzed, e.g., as sum of fixation durations over a single trial) vs.—(not analyzed)	–
	DN	Description of the dynamics of the fixation behavior that was not related to a specific event: x (analyzed, e.g., as order of fixations) vs.—(not analyzed)	x
	DE	Description of the dynamics of the fixation behavior that was related to a specific event: x (analyzed, e.g., in relation to a particular stimulus) vs.—(not analyzed)	–