Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 2;2017:8963267. doi: 10.1155/2017/8963267

Table 2.

Correlations of the mean RNFLT at different diameters with the BMO-MRW, the perimeter-corrected BMO-MRW (cpBMO-MRW), and the area-corrected BMO-MRW (caBMO-MRW) are shown.

RNFLT BMO-MRW cpBMO-MRW caBMO-MRW
3.5 mm G 0.292∗∗ 0.501∗∗∗ 0.502∗∗∗
3.5 mm T 0.108 0.182 0.191
3.5 mm TS 0.225 0.396∗∗∗ 0.431∗∗∗
3.5 mm TI 0.230 0.338∗∗ 0.304
3.5 mm N 0.251 0.395∗∗∗ 0.435∗∗∗
3.5 mm NS 0.257 0.427∗∗∗ 0.455∗∗∗
3.5 mm NI 0.305∗∗ 0.370∗∗∗ 0.319∗∗
4.1 mm G 0.272 0.496∗∗∗ 0.514∗∗∗
4.1 mm T 0.121 0.203 0.211
4.1 mm TS 0.179 0.345∗∗ 0.405∗∗∗
4.1 mm TI 0.262 0.391∗∗∗ 0.360∗∗∗
4.1 mm N 0.229 0.374∗∗∗ 0.421∗∗∗
4.1 mm NS 0.230 0.340∗∗∗ 0.433∗∗∗
4.1 mm NI 0.231 0.300∗∗ 0.270
4.7 mm G 0.265 0.473∗∗∗ 0.486∗∗∗
4.7 mm T 0.115 0.159 0.144
4.7 mm TS 0.159 0.341∗∗∗ 0.421∗∗∗
4.7 mm TI 0.297∗∗ 0.425∗∗ 0.390∗∗∗
4.7 mm N 0.181 0.335∗∗∗ 0.397∗∗∗
4.7 mm NS 0.237 0.404∗∗ 0.431∗∗∗
4.7 mm NI 0.229 0.296∗∗ 0.261

The correlation coefficient, r, is shown with asterisks demonstrating significance (p ≤ 0.5, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). The results are divided into global (G) and six sectors (temporal (T), temporal-superior (TS), temporal-inferior (TI), nasal (N), nasal-superior (NS), and nasal-inferior (NI)).