Table 5.

Methodological quality by COSMIN checklist of the studies analyzing absolute reliability of HHD and ID.

Author	Was the percentage of missing values given?	Was there a description of how missing values were handled?	Was the sample size analysis adequate?	Important flaws Random allocation	Were at least two measurements available?	Were the administrations independent?	Was the time interval stated?	Was the time interval appropriate?	Were the test conditions similar for both measurements?	Was the SEM; SDC, or LOA calculated?	Rating
Arnold, C	Good	Fair	Poor	Exc	Exc	Fair	Exc	Fair	Exc	Exc	Poor
Kelln, B	Good	Fair	Poor	Exc	Exc	Fair	Exc	Fair	Exc	Exc	Poor
Kawaguchi, J	Good	Fair	Poor	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Poor
Mentiplay, B	Good	Fair	Fair	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Poor
Tung Wu, Lu	Poor	Fair	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Claiborne, T	Good	Fair	Poor	Poor	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Dauty. M	Good	Fair	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Hartmann, A	Good	Fair	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Fair	Exc	Exc	Poor
Pereira de Carvallo, A	Good	Fair	Poor	Poor	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Ferri Morales, A	Good	Fair	Fair	NA	Good	NA	Exc	Good	Exc	Exc	Fair
Dervisevic, l	Good	Fair	Poor	Poor	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Larsson, B	Good	Fair	Poor	NA	Good	NA	Exc	Good	Exc	Exc	Poor
Morrison, K	Good	Fair	Poor	Poor	Exc	Poor	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Poor
Holmback, A	Good	Fair	Fair	NA	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Fair
Kim, WK	Good	Fair	Fair	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Exc	Fair

Abbreviations: Exc, excellent; NA, not aplicable