Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;8:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01795

Table 1.

Multiple regression analyses predicting maladaptive emotion regulation strategies as a function of group (BD and C), distress and their interaction.

Model β t p R2 f2 F p Bootstrap CI (95%)
Self-blame 0.17 0.20 3.49 0.02
Group -1.09 -1.03 0.31 [-3.18; 0.96]
Distress -0.16 -0.61 0.55 [-0.76; 0.51]
Distress × group 1.04 2.68 0.01 0.12 0.14 7.16 0.01 [0.21; 1.8]
Condition effect of distress on Rumination for each group:
C (=0) -0.16 -0.61 0.55 [-3.18; 0.96]
BD (=1) 0.88 3.04 0.003 [-2.15; 2.05]
Rumination 0.10 0.11 1.99 0.13
Group -0.17 -0.19 0.85 [-2; 1.58]
Distress -0.18 -0.82 0.42 [-0.63; 0.29]
Distress × group 0.75 2.26 0.03 0.09 0.10 5.11 0.03 [-0.08; 1.40]
Condition effect of distress on Rumination for each group:
C (=0) -0.18 -0.82 0.42 [-2; 1.58]
BD ( = 1) 0.57 2.30 0.03 [-1.44; 2.4]
Blaming others 0.10 0.11 1.87 0.15
Group -0.01 -0.10 0.92 [-0.29; 0.23]
Distress 0.03 0.85 0.40 [-0.05; 0.08]
Distress × group 0.05 1.09 0.28 0.02 0.02 1.18 0.28 [-0.03; 0.14]
Catastrophizing 0.29 0.41 0.50 0.68
Group -0.12 -0.92 0.36 [-0.42; 0.16]
Distress -0.01 -0.31 0.76 [-0.09; 0.09]
Distress × group 0.04 0.78 0.44 0.01 0.01 0.61 0.44 [-0.08; 0.14]
Maladaptive strategies 0.19 0.23 3.88 0.01
Group -2.27 -0.99 0.32 [-7.33; 2.33]
Distress -0.26 -0.47 0.64 [-1.57; 1.18]
Distress × group 2.30 2.75 0.008 0.12 0.14 7.58 0.008 [0.54; 3.90]
Condition effect of distress on Rumination for each group:
C (=0) -0.26 -0.47 0.64 [-7.33; 2.33]
BD (=1) 2.04 3.27 0.002 [-5.11; 4.41]

All β coefficients are unstandardized.