Table 10.

Multiple regression analyses predicting adaptive emotion regulation strategies as a function of public SC, distress and their interaction in the control group.

Model	β	t	p	R2	f2	F	p	Bootstrap CI (95%)
Acceptance				0.14	0.16	1.07	0.38
Public SC	-0.06	-0.34	0.74					[-0.31; 0.40]
Distress	-0.11	-0.48	0.64					[-0.62; 0.45]
Distress × public SC	0.11	1.79	0.09	0.14	0.16	3.2	0.09	[-0.06; 0.21]
Positive refocusing				0.38	0.61	3.86	0.03
Public SC	-0.08	-0.49	0.63					[-0.42; 0.40]
Distress	-0.09	-0.41	0.69					[-0.50; 0.48]
Distress × public SC	0.21	3.37	0.003	0.37	0.59	11.37	0.003	[0.02; 0.37]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC	% below		% above
-2.78	21.74		78.26
3.09	65.22		34.78
Positive reappraisal				0.37	0.59	3.77	0.03
Public SC	-0.38	-1.73	0.10					[-0.80; 0.01]
Distress	0.34	1.10	0.29					[-0.48; 1.02]
Distress × public SC	0.21	2.58	0.02	0.22	0.28	6.68	0.02	[0.06; 0.37]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC	% below		% above
1.38	52.17		47.83
Putting into perspective				0.06	0.06	0.39	0.76
Public SC	-0.14	-0.61	0.55					[-0.59; 0.48]
Distress	0.11	0.32	0.75					[-0.74; 0.99]
Distress × public SC	0.07	0.83	0.42	0.03	0.03	0.69	0.42	[-0.14; 0.26]
Refocus on planning				0.24	0.32	1.98	0.15
Public SC	-0.06	-0.30	0.77					[-0.40; 0.42]
Distress	-0.21	-0.79	0.44					[0.87; 0.57]
Distress × public SC	0.17	2.43	0.03	0.24	0.32	5.88	0.03	[-0.02; 0.29]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC	% below		% above
-4.26	13.04		86.96
8.38	95.65		4.35
Adaptive strategies				0.36	0.56	3.60	0.03
Public SC	-0.71	-1.08	0.29					[-1.93; 1.04]
Distress	0.03	0.04	0.97					[-2.29; 2.53]
Distress × public SC	0.77	3.12	0.006	0.33	0.49	9.75	0.006	[0.13; 1.23]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC	% below		% above
-4.36	13.04		86.96
2.67	65.22		34.78

All β coefficients are unstandardized.