Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;8:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01795

Table 10.

Multiple regression analyses predicting adaptive emotion regulation strategies as a function of public SC, distress and their interaction in the control group.

Model β t p R2 f2 F p Bootstrap CI (95%)
Acceptance 0.14 0.16 1.07 0.38
Public SC -0.06 -0.34 0.74 [-0.31; 0.40]
Distress -0.11 -0.48 0.64 [-0.62; 0.45]
Distress × public SC 0.11 1.79 0.09 0.14 0.16 3.2 0.09 [-0.06; 0.21]
Positive refocusing 0.38 0.61 3.86 0.03
Public SC -0.08 -0.49 0.63 [-0.42; 0.40]
Distress -0.09 -0.41 0.69 [-0.50; 0.48]
Distress × public SC 0.21 3.37 0.003 0.37 0.59 11.37 0.003 [0.02; 0.37]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC % below % above
-2.78 21.74 78.26
3.09 65.22 34.78
Positive reappraisal 0.37 0.59 3.77 0.03
Public SC -0.38 -1.73 0.10 [-0.80; 0.01]
Distress 0.34 1.10 0.29 [-0.48; 1.02]
Distress × public SC 0.21 2.58 0.02 0.22 0.28 6.68 0.02 [0.06; 0.37]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC % below % above
1.38 52.17 47.83
Putting into perspective 0.06 0.06 0.39 0.76
Public SC -0.14 -0.61 0.55 [-0.59; 0.48]
Distress 0.11 0.32 0.75 [-0.74; 0.99]
Distress × public SC 0.07 0.83 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.69 0.42 [-0.14; 0.26]
Refocus on planning 0.24 0.32 1.98 0.15
Public SC -0.06 -0.30 0.77 [-0.40; 0.42]
Distress -0.21 -0.79 0.44 [0.87; 0.57]
Distress × public SC 0.17 2.43 0.03 0.24 0.32 5.88 0.03 [-0.02; 0.29]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC % below % above
-4.26 13.04 86.96
8.38 95.65 4.35
Adaptive strategies 0.36 0.56 3.60 0.03
Public SC -0.71 -1.08 0.29 [-1.93; 1.04]
Distress 0.03 0.04 0.97 [-2.29; 2.53]
Distress × public SC 0.77 3.12 0.006 0.33 0.49 9.75 0.006 [0.13; 1.23]
Johnson–Neyman significance region
Value SC % below % above
-4.36 13.04 86.96
2.67 65.22 34.78

All β coefficients are unstandardized.