Skip to main content
letter
. 2017 Oct 23;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s40462-017-0113-1

Table 1.

Support and criticism for the “radical-pair” and “magnetite-based” magnetoreception hypotheses

Support Criticism
Radical–Pair Experiments showing that birds can only sense the magnetic field under illumination with relative short wavelength, as opposed to longer wavelengths [41] The effect of the magnetic field on the spin-state of the molecule has not been demonstrated, either in vitro or in vivo, under the Earth’s weak magnetic field, but only under a field orders of magnitude stronger [20, 47]
The activation mechanism is missing, meaning how the signal transduces to initiate a neural response.
Magnetite-Based Magnetite crystals have been detected in magnetic sensing fish, reptiles and birds [18, 28, 48] The magnetites found in some magnetic-sensing animals are not associated to the animals’ neuronal, or other tissue, but rather located in macrophages [30] or as contaminants [32]
Magnetotactic-bacteria (MTB) can act upon the field via similar magnetite crystals [2, 22] No one has seen magnetite crystals serving as a ‘magnetic-sensor’ except in bacteria [20]
The activation mechanism is missing, meaning how the signal transduces to initiate a neural response.