Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 23;15:207. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0782-x

Table 2.

Provisional scaled item response values

Response Level Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12
0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1 0.582 0.021 0.462 0.000 0.000 0.449 0.000 0.704 0.000 0.422 0.733 0.698
2 1.493 0.021 0.880 0.745 0.653 1.091 0.000 0.704 1.423 1.072 1.099 0.852
3 1.493 0.206 0.880 0.745 1.187 1.268 1.009 1.492 1.423 1.727 1.632 1.695
4 2.079 1.143 2.199 1.421 1.720 1.509 1.446 1.657 1.423 1.727 1.710 2.141
5 2.354 1.356 2.333 2.324 1.890 2.302 1.206 1.749 1.423 2.110 1.926 2.789

Short Item Key: 1 Q1 - Draining ear; Q2 - Smelly ear; Q3 - Hearing at home; Q4 - Hearing in noise; Q5 - Discomfort/pain; Q6 – Dizziness; Q7 – Tinnitus; Q8 - Activity restriction; Q9 – Need to limit exposure to water; Q10 - GP visits; Q11 - Taking medicines; Q12 - Overall QoL impact of hearing problems

Entries are the adopted item response values for the 5 levels for each of the 12 questions when regressing them against a preliminary total score. Here that dependent variable was the total 1st PC total (out of 5 X 12 = 60, unscaled, but scored continuously as integers), for the average of 1st two visits so in effect a grain of 1/120 in the dependent variable. The exemplified independent variable category means estimated are the set from visit. The 12 scaling regressions shown in Table 2 are done individually for the chosen dataset eg Visit 1, 2 combined), taking the responses of 0–5 as category labels for their means in the raw total to be estimated from data by regression mapping, not as integer arithmetical values