Fig. 7.
Incorporation of RAP1 into shelterincore complex does not change TRF2:TIN2 complex stoichiometry, and there are two each of RAP1 and TRF2. Telomerase stimulation by shelterin complexes is also not affected by RAP1 inclusion. a Superose 6 gel-filtration trace of co-expressed shelterincore (+RAP1) complex (RAP1–TRF2–TIN2–TPP1–POT1) showed a mono-disperse peak (left peak) with SDS-PAGE showing five distinct Coomassie-stained bands representing the five shelterin proteins. SEC-MALS analysis determined the protein complex to be 348.7 ± 1.7 kDa, with the bottom number in parentheses being the theoretical mass for a 2:2:1:1:1 (RAP1:TRF2:TIN2:TPP1:POT1) complex. The right peak is composed of excess un-incorporated RAP1, POT1 and TIN2. b Purified singly ybbR-tagged shelterincore (+RAP1) complex labeled with Cy3-CoA dye and compared with Coomassie-stained bands as reference. *Molecular weight is an apparent value of SeeBlue Plus2 protein marker (Thermo Fisher) on a tris-glycine gel. c Quantification of fluorescence-intensity showed TRF2:TIN2 relative stoichiometry to be 2:1 (P < 0.05) while TRF2:RAP1 is 1:1. Error bars indicate s.d. for three independent experiments performed with three different protein preparations. d Direct telomerase assay to determine the effects of RAP1 inclusion on processivity stimulation by shelterincore(−POT1) or shelterincore complexes. e Total activity of telomerase primer elongation products (relative to no-protein lane) with bound shelterin protein complexes at various concentrations (nM). f Telomerase processivity (relative to no-protein lane) with each shelterin protein/complex. (For panels e and f, error bars indicate the range for two independent experiments.)