Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2017 Jul 17;30(8):1592–1598. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00114

Table 2.

Matrix Effect (ME) at Eight Calibration Points Using Aqueous (Matrix-Free) Solutions and RBCs from Bovine (Bovine)

pmol mean peak area area ratio ratioa ME% IS IS-compensated ME



analyte IS matrix free bovine analyte


matrix free bovine matrix free bovine
Cal A 8.29 63 105 31 836 259 384 137 543 0.24 0.23 0.24 50.4 53.0 1.0
Cal B 10.91 89 904 38 023 262 692 110 915 0.34 0.34 0.34 42.3 42.2 1.0
Cal C 16.58 132 366 58 094 268 016 117 422 0.49 0.49 0.49 43.9 43.8 1.0
Cal D 21.83 191 236 77 117 272 020 119 664 0.70 0.64 0.67 40.3 44.0 0.9
Cal E 33.16 281 336 118 103 266 962 119 057 1.05 0.99 1.02 42.0 44.6 0.9
Cal F 43.66 389 684 168 554 274 876 120 404 1.42 1.40 1.41 43.3 43.8 1.0
Cal G 66.32 566 098 254 415 266 594 123 205 2.12 2.06 2.09 44.9 46.2 1.0
Cal H 87.32 787 933 380 060 269 786 135 215 2.92 2.81 2.88 48.2 50.4 1.0
7.6b 8.2b 4.7b
a

Average ratio of matrix free analyte/IS and analyte/IS in bovine.

b

Coefficient of variation (%CV).