Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 12;8(44):76204–76213. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19211

Table 3. Comparison of the minor allele frequency of the 5 SNPs in MPN patients.

SNP Gene Alleles* PV MAF (n=54) ET MAF (n=109) MF MAF (n=15) PV vs. ET PV vs. MF ET vs. MF PV vs. ET vs. MF
P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
rs12343867 JAK2 46/1 C/T 0.63 0.42 0.47 <0.001 2.39 (1.48-3.84) 0.108 1.94 (0.86-4.40) 0.598 0.81 (0.38-1.75) 0.001
rs12339666 JAK2 intron 8 T/G 0.66 0.42 0.53 <0.001 2.63 (1.63-4.25) 0.213 1.68 (0.74-3.81) 0.249 0.64 (0.30-1.37) <0.001
rs2201862 -MECOM T/C 0.15 0.21 0.37 0.179 0.65 (0.35-1.22) 0.008 0.30 (0.12-0.75) 0.056 0.46 (0.20-1.04) 0.030
rs9376092 HBS1L-MYB A/C 0.18 0.31 0.30 0.009 0.47 (0.27-0.83) 0.135 0.50 (0.20-1.26) 0.895 1.06 (0.46-2.43) 0.031
rs2736100 TERT C/A 0.56 0.52 0.47 0.429 1.21 (0.76-1.92) 0.340 1.48 (0.66-3.34) 0.595 1.23 (0.57-2.64) 0.571

CI, confident interval; ET, essential thrombocythemia; MAF, minor allele frequency; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; MF; myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; OR, odds ratio; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

*Risk-associated/non-risk-associated alleles.

Two cases and one case with ET were absent in rs12343867 group and rs2201862 group, respectively due to lack of sample.

P values were analyzed using Pearson χ2-test (two-tailed).