Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0185097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185097

Table 5. Reversal of expression profile toward a healthy state after anti-miR-142-5p treatment.

Gene symbol Fold change anti-miR-142-5p vs scrambleda Fold change transfer colitic mice vs non-colitic miceb Fold change transfer colitic mice vs non-colitic micec
UP
Cyp2c55 28.8 -8.1 -4.8
MAL 17.5 -1.2
HMGCS2 17.2 -5.0 -1.5
Mettl7b 10.4 -2.4
Sult1a1 8.9 -11.3 -10.0
Mep1a 7.9 -4.3 -2.7
Aldob (= Aldo2) 6.8 -9.0 -5.7
Aldh1a1 5.9 -2.2 -2.3
Hspa1a 5.8 -8.4 -19.5
Edn2 4.9 -3.1 -2.5
Sult1d1 4.8 -10.4 -3.6
Dpep1 4.2 -3.4 -4.8
DOWN
Sprr2d -20.0 28.2 5.7
Serpinb11 -14.3 28.9
S100a9 -7.8 168.1 225.4
Sprr2h -5.8 29.5 14.5
Dlk1 -5.7 8.1 4.9
Sprr2b -4.5 2.3 1.6

Selection of genes with potential relation to inflammatory intestinal disorders or gut physiology that are strongly up- or downregulated in colon mRNA analysis of anti-miR-142-5p-treated versus scrambled LNA treated colitic mice (2nd column). A reversed expression profile is observed when comparing transfer colitic mice to control non-colitic mice (3rd column). This reversed expression profile is also seen in data from our previously published study, also comparing transfer colitic mice to control non-colitic mice (4th column).